Loos Elke, Volpe Benjamin, Vermorken Bernd L, van Boxel Stan C J, Devocht Elke M J, Stultiens Joost J A, Postma Alida A, Guinand Nils, Pérez-Fornos Angelica, Desloovere Christian, Verhaert Nicolas, van de Berg Raymond
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May;282(5):2285-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09098-7. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
In vestibular implants (VI), the electrode position is thought to be important for optimal neural activation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of the vestibular electrode position over time.
Seven patients implanted with a VI were followed for one year. When possible, the fenestrations of the semicircular canals were kept very small (approximately 0.8 mm) to stabilize the electrode lead. Additionally, the electrodes were fixed at their fenestration sites using bone cement. A temporal bone CT scan was performed intraoperatively, and one week and one year postoperatively. In one patient reliable analysis of the intraoperative CT scan was not possible due to a technical error. A displacement of the vestibular electrodes of more than 0.5 mm was considered significant.
Fourteen out of 18 electrodes did not show a significant displacement between the intraoperative scan and the first postoperative scan. In the remaining four electrodes, a displacement of ≥ 0.5 mm occurred (mean 0.54 mm, range 0.50-0.58 mm). These four electrodes were found in the two first implanted patients. In both cases, the intraoperative CT scan had a slice thickness of 0.5 mm and showed severe scattering. This might imply that the measured displacement was (partially) related to a higher measurement error. None of the vestibular electrodes migrated outside of the ampulla. No displacement was observed in any of the vestibular electrodes between the first postoperative scan and the one-year follow-up scan.
The current surgical technique seems to securely stabilize the vestibular VI electrodes over time.
在前庭植入物(VI)中,电极位置被认为对实现最佳神经激活至关重要。本研究的目的是评估前庭电极位置随时间的稳定性。
对7例植入VI的患者进行了为期一年的随访。在可能的情况下,将半规管的开窗保持得非常小(约0.8毫米)以稳定电极导线。此外,使用骨水泥将电极固定在其开窗部位。术中、术后一周和一年进行颞骨CT扫描。由于技术错误,1例患者无法对术中CT扫描进行可靠分析。前庭电极移位超过0.5毫米被认为具有显著性。
18个电极中有14个在术中扫描和首次术后扫描之间未显示出显著移位。其余4个电极发生了≥0.5毫米的移位(平均0.54毫米,范围0.50 - 0.58毫米)。这4个电极出现在最初植入的2例患者中。在这两种情况下,术中CT扫描的层厚为0.5毫米,且显示出严重散射。这可能意味着所测量的移位(部分)与较高的测量误差有关。没有前庭电极移出行壶腹。在首次术后扫描和一年随访扫描之间,未观察到任何前庭电极发生移位。
目前的手术技术似乎能长期可靠地稳定前庭VI电极。