Centre for Health Policy and Implementation Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11961-6.
In low- and-middle-income-countries (LMICs) like Ghana, universal access to quality healthcare remains a mirage and this undermines achievement of sustainable development goal (SDG) 3. The SafeCare Quality Improvement (QI) programme is an initiative of PharmAccess Foundation, a Netherlands-based non-governmental organisation (NGO). In 2009 SafeCare QI programme was launched in Ghana to help address gaps in healthcare quality standards, leveraging existing local resources. Over 600 private and public healthcare facilities are currently enrolled in the programme and is being adopted for nation-wide rollout by government of Ghana and implementing partners.
This paper explored views and experiences of frontline health staff and policy makers on the SafeCare quality improvement programme in Ghana and how local resources were leveraged in its implementation.
Design/setting: The evaluation was conducted in 53 private and public healthcare facilities from seven administrative regions of Ghana across the coastal, middle, and northern geopolitical belts. The regions are Ashanti (n = 12), Bono East (n = 8), Bono (n = 3), Greater Accra (n = 12), Oti (n = 4), Savannah (n = 8) and Western (n = 9).
Quota and purposive sampling techniques were used to sample the healthcare facilities in accordance with the study eligibility criteria. Total of 45 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 47 individual in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted among frontline staff and policy makers from government and private local partner institutions.
Group and individual interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic content analysis done using Nvivo (version 12.0) software.
Overall, participants perceived the relevance and benefits of the SafeCare programme to be "very satisfactory" while the programme impact, rollout process and success were perceived to be "satisfactory". Quality healthcare standards were perceived to have improved in beneficiary health facilities due to participation in the SafeCare programme. Patient satisfaction, service utilisation and revenue generation in healthcare facilities were also attributed to the SafeCare programme. Proposals were made for harmonisation of existing QI assessment tools to mitigate duplications. Agreed data sharing protocols and interoperability with existing national database were also recommended to promote sustainability. Finally, low staff motivation, high workload, lack of financial and material resources were cited as potential impediments to full compliance with the SafeCare QI standards by healthcare facilities enrolled in the programme.
SafeCare QI programme has contributed to QI and adherence to patient safety standards in Ghana. Sustainability is however dependent on continuous government commitment as the programme gets adopted as a national QI programme. Overlaps in content of QI assessment tools ought to be addressed to promote efficiency without compromising quality standards. The SafeCare programme demonstrates that health systems in LMICs have the potential to attain acceptable quality healthcare standards when they take advantage of existing local resources, including private-public partnership (PPP) and peer-learning opportunities.
在加纳等中低收入国家(LMICs),全民获得高质量医疗服务仍然是一个遥不可及的目标,这阻碍了可持续发展目标(SDG)3 的实现。SafeCare 质量改进(QI)计划是 PharmAccess 基金会的一个倡议,该基金会是一家总部位于荷兰的非政府组织(NGO)。2009 年,SafeCare QI 计划在加纳启动,旨在利用现有当地资源,解决医疗质量标准方面的差距。目前,已有超过 600 家私营和公共医疗机构参与了该计划,加纳政府和实施伙伴正在将其推广到全国范围。
本文探讨了加纳一线卫生工作者和政策制定者对 SafeCare 质量改进计划的看法和经验,以及如何利用当地资源来实施该计划。
设计/设置:评估在加纳七个行政区域的 53 家私营和公共医疗机构进行,这些区域横跨沿海、中部和北部地缘政治带。这些地区是阿散蒂(n=12)、博诺东(n=8)、博诺(n=3)、大阿克拉(n=12)、奥蒂(n=4)、萨凡纳(n=8)和西部(n=9)。
根据研究资格标准,采用配额和 purposive 抽样技术对医疗机构进行抽样。共进行了 45 次焦点小组讨论(FGD)和 47 次个人深入访谈(IDI),参与者来自政府和私营地方合作伙伴机构的一线工作人员和政策制定者。
对小组和个人访谈进行了录音、逐字转录,并使用 Nvivo(版本 12.0)软件进行了主题内容分析。
总体而言,参与者认为 SafeCare 计划的相关性和益处“非常令人满意”,而计划的影响、推出过程和成功被认为是“满意”的。由于参与了 SafeCare 计划,受益的医疗机构的医疗质量标准被认为有所提高。患者满意度、服务利用和医疗机构的收入增长也归因于 SafeCare 计划。还提出了协调现有质量改进评估工具的建议,以减轻重复。还建议达成一致的数据共享协议,并与现有国家数据库实现互操作性,以促进可持续性。最后,参与该计划的医疗机构指出,工作人员激励不足、工作量大、缺乏财务和物质资源,是全面遵守 SafeCare QI 标准的潜在障碍。
SafeCare QI 计划为加纳的 QI 和遵守患者安全标准做出了贡献。然而,可持续性取决于政府的持续承诺,因为该计划被采纳为国家 QI 计划。质量评估工具的内容重叠应该得到解决,以提高效率,同时不影响质量标准。SafeCare 计划表明,当中低收入国家的卫生系统利用现有当地资源(包括公私伙伴关系和同行学习机会)时,它们有潜力实现可接受的高质量医疗服务标准。