The relationship between work-family conflict, stress and depression among Chinese correctional officers: a mediation and network analysis study.

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have found that depression is prevalent among correctional officers (COs), which may be related to the work-family conflict (WFC) faced by this cohort. Role conflict theory posits that WFC emerges from the incompatibility between the demands of work and family roles, which induces stress and, in turn, results in emotional problems. Thus, this study seeks to investigate the association between WFC and depression, along with examining the mediating role of stress. Further network analysis is applied to identify the core and bridge symptoms within the network of WFC, stress, and depression, providing a basis for targeted interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the relationship between work-family conflict (WFC) and depressive symptoms among a larger sample of Chinese correctional officers (COs), exploring the potential mechanisms of stress in this population through network analysis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 472 Chinese COs was conducted from October 2021 to January 2022. WFC, stress, and depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Work-Family Conflict Scale (WFCS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Subsequently, correlation and regression analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0, while mediation analysis was performed using Model 4 in PROCESS. By using the EBICglasso model, network analyses were utilized to estimate the network structure of WFC, stress and depression. Visualization and centrality measures were performed using the R package.

RESULTS

The results showed that (1) there was a significant positive correlation between WFC and stress and depression, as well as between stress and depression, (2) WFC and stress had a significant positive predictive effect on depression, (3) stress mediated the relationship between WFC and depression, with a total mediating effect of 0.262 (BootSE = 0.031, BCI 95% = 0.278, 0.325), which accounted for 81.62% of the total effect, and (4) in the WFC, stress, and depression network model, strain-based work interference with family (SWF, (betweenness = 2.24, closeness = -0.19, strength = 1.40), difficult to relax (DR, betweenness = 1.20, closeness = 1.85, strength = 1.06), and had nothing (HN, betweenness = -0.43, closeness = 0.62, strength = 0.73) were the core symptoms, and SWF, IT, and DH were the bridge symptoms, and (5) first-line COs had significantly higher levels of WFC, stress, and depression than non-first-line correctional officers.

CONCLUSION

Our findings elucidate the interrelationships between WFC, stress, and depression among COs. The study also enhances the understanding of the factors influencing WFC in this population and provides valuable guidance for the development of future interventions, offering practical clinical significance.