Suppr超能文献

由两种不同工具测定的盲鼠自由活动节律周期的变化。

Change in period of free-running rhythms determined by two different tools in blinded rats.

作者信息

Yamada N, Shimoda K, Takahashi K, Takahashi S

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 1986;36(2):357-62. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90029-6.

Abstract

Drinking rhythm in 6 rats optically enucleated on the day of birth was determined every one to two weeks after weaning until the age of 28 weeks. Each rat was transferred repeatedly from a cage without a running wheel to one with a running wheel, and vice versa. During the periods when the rats were housed in the former cage, drinking rhythm delayed, while it advanced when they were housed in the latter. The rats, which had a period of free-running rhythm of motor activity longer than 24 hr when measured by an Automex device in a cage without a running wheel, showed a period shorter than 24 hr when measured by a running wheel. These results suggest that the difference in tools for determination of activity may influence the results of animal experiments for free-running rhythm, and warn investigators of risks being caused by the selection of tools.

摘要

对出生当天进行光学摘除眼球的6只大鼠,在断奶后每隔一到两周测定其饮水节律,直至28周龄。每只大鼠反复从没有跑轮的笼子转移到有跑轮的笼子,反之亦然。在大鼠被安置在前一种笼子的期间,饮水节律延迟,而当它们被安置在后一种笼子时,饮水节律提前。在没有跑轮的笼子里用Automex设备测量时,运动活动的自由运行节律周期超过24小时的大鼠,在用跑轮测量时显示周期短于24小时。这些结果表明,用于测定活动的工具差异可能会影响自由运行节律动物实验的结果,并提醒研究人员注意工具选择所带来的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验