• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The intersection of prescription drugs and medical devices: the evaluation and funding challenges of two categories of emerging health technologies.处方药与医疗器械的交叉领域:两类新兴健康技术的评估与资金投入挑战
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 29;41(1):e1. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004768.
2
Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.医疗器械的卫生技术评估:对非欧盟机构的一项调查
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(3):154-65. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000185. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
3
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHODS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES: HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE GAPS? THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.医疗器械卫生技术评估方法指南:如何弥补差距?国际医学和生物学工程联合会的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(3):276-289. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000314. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
4
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
'The problem is small enough, the problem is big enough': a qualitative study of health technology assessment and public policy on drug funding decisions for children.“问题虽小,却也重大”:儿童药物资金决策的卫生技术评估和公共政策的定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Mar 30;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01164-w.
6
Why is There Discordance between the Reimbursement of High-Cost 'Life-Extending' Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices? The Funding of Ventricular Assist Devices in Australia.为什么高价“延长生命”的药品和医疗器械的报销存在差异?澳大利亚心室辅助设备的资金来源。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Aug;17(4):421-431. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00470-x.
7
Health Technology Assessment for Molecular Diagnostics: Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations from the Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group.分子诊断的卫生技术评估:医疗器械与诊断特别兴趣小组的实践、挑战与建议
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
8
Appraisals by Health Technology Assessment Agencies of Economic Evaluations Submitted as Part of Reimbursement Dossiers for Oncology Treatments: Evidence from Canada, the UK, and Australia.卫生技术评估机构对肿瘤治疗报销文件中提交的经济评估的评价:来自加拿大、英国和澳大利亚的证据。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;29(10):7624-7636. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100602.
9
INTRODUCTION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR MEDICINES IN SLOVAKIA.斯洛伐克药品卫生技术评估简介。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(3):345-349. doi: 10.1017/S026646231700006X. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.连接医疗器械的监管与报销流程:综合评估的必要性。
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26 Suppl 1:13-29. doi: 10.1002/hec.3479.

本文引用的文献

1
Considering patient perspectives in economic evaluations of health interventions.考虑健康干预措施的经济评估中的患者视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;11:1212583. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1212583. eCollection 2023.
2
The Evolving Nature of Health Technology Assessment: A Critical Appraisal of NICE's New Methods Manual.卫生技术评估的发展变化:对 NICE 新方法手册的批判性评价。
Value Health. 2023 Oct;26(10):1503-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Aripiprazole Tablets with Sensor versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia Using a Patient-Level Microsimulation Modeling Approach.采用患者水平微观模拟建模方法比较阿立哌唑口溶膜片与口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 May 22;15:375-386. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S396806. eCollection 2023.
4
Cost-effectiveness Thresholds Used by Study Authors, 1990-2021.1990 - 2021年研究作者使用的成本效益阈值。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1312-1314. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1792.
5
Understanding innovation of health technology assessment methods: the IHTAM framework.理解卫生技术评估方法的创新:IHTAM 框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jan 31;38(1):e16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000010.
6
Similarities and Differences in Health Technology Assessment Systems and Implications for Coverage Decisions: Evidence from 32 Countries.卫生技术评估系统的异同及其对覆盖决策的影响:来自32个国家的证据
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 May;6(3):315-328. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00311-5. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Early Cost-Effectiveness of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec-xioi (Zolgensma) and Nusinersen (Spinraza) Treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy I in The Netherlands With Relapse Scenarios.荷兰脊髓性肌萎缩症 I 患者使用 Onasemnogene Abeparvovec-xioi(Zolgensma)和 Nusinersen(Spinraza)治疗的早期成本效益:考虑复发情景
Value Health. 2021 Jun;24(6):759-769. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.021. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Economic modeling of reSET-O, a prescription digital therapeutic for patients with opioid use disorder.用于治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者的处方数字治疗 reSET-O 的经济建模。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):61-68. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1858581.
9
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Budget Impact Analysis and Evaluation of Patients' Experiences, Preferences, and Values.微创青光眼手术:预算影响分析以及对患者体验、偏好和价值观的评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Dec 12;19(9):1-57. eCollection 2019.

处方药与医疗器械的交叉领域:两类新兴健康技术的评估与资金投入挑战

The intersection of prescription drugs and medical devices: the evaluation and funding challenges of two categories of emerging health technologies.

作者信息

Rodrigues Caroline, Fu Rui, Ghose Turjoy, Yurga Emre, Nauenberg Eric

机构信息

Institute for Management and Innovation, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

Departments of Community Health Sciences, Surgery & Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 29;41(1):e1. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324004768.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324004768
PMID:39610366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703628/
Abstract

Health technology assessments (HTAs) are policy analysis frameworks contributing to the approval, reimbursement, and rollout of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. New innovations in health technologies expose gaps in reimbursement and implementation guidelines. We defined two types of emerging health technologies: (1) therapeutic innovations, such as drug-device combination products or nondrug alternatives to prescription drugs and (2) disruptive health innovations such as novel surgeries and gene replacement therapies. We aimed to determine delineated definitions for these categories through a comprehensive review of HTA guidelines across 20 nations. Utilizing databases such as International Network of Agencies for HTA, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, and European Medical Agency, we identified products falling within these categories. Real-world case studies highlighted the inadequacies stemming from the absence of clear definitions and proposed solutions to enhance current HTA guidelines. These shortcomings apply at the state or provincial level in addition to national jurisdictions as existing funding structures and silos fail to accommodate the unique attributes of these technologies.

摘要

卫生技术评估(HTA)是有助于生物技术和药品审批、报销及推广的政策分析框架。卫生技术领域的新创新暴露了报销和实施指南方面的差距。我们定义了两种新兴卫生技术:(1)治疗性创新,如药物-器械组合产品或处方药的非药物替代方案;(2)颠覆性卫生创新,如新型手术和基因替代疗法。我们旨在通过全面审查20个国家的HTA指南来确定这些类别的明确界定。利用国际卫生技术评估机构网络、国际药物经济学与成果研究学会和欧洲药品管理局等数据库,我们确定了属于这些类别的产品。实际案例研究突出了因缺乏明确界定而产生的不足,并提出了加强现行HTA指南的解决方案。由于现有的资金结构和部门壁垒无法适应这些技术的独特属性,这些缺点不仅适用于国家管辖范围,也适用于州或省级层面。