Andreasen Karen, Rasch Vibeke, Dokkedahl Sarah, Schei Berit, Linde Ditte S
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2024 Dec;42:101046. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101046. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
To understand barriers and facilitators for participation in digital IPV screening and a digital supportive intervention among pregnant women.
Pregnant women attending standard antenatal care in the Region of Southern Denmark were systematically screened for IPV through a digital questionnaire. Those who screened positive were offered 3-6 video consultations with midwives and access to safety planning app. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with pregnant women who screened positive for IPV and participated in a digital supportive intervention.
Twenty pregnant women were interviewed, and the following facilitators for participation were highlighted: The digital systematic screening approach was acceptable and helped acknowledge IPV exposure as women experienced it as more private and allowed for reflection time compared to risk-based, face-to-face screening. Video counselling was highly acceptable, as the digital approach eased conversations on sensitive topics and the flexibility boosted participation. Trust in the healthcare system, having a trained midwife as a counsellor, and familiarity with the digital tool enhanced participation. Barriers included concerns about disclosing IPV, technological issues, and the need for a private space for counselling. Additionally, women who had experienced digital violence were uncomfortable with the digital nature of the intervention. The safety app was perceived as being inefficient as it did not meet the needs of the women.
Systematic digital screening and supportive video counselling for IPV within antenatal care is well-received among pregnant women as it offers increased privacy and flexibility and facilitating discussions on sensitive topics. To enhance participation, barriers such as confidentiality concerns, technological challenges, and the need for private counselling spaces must be addressed. Incorporating digital tools into antenatal care can supplement other support services and increase the proportion of pregnant women who receive help.
了解孕妇参与数字亲密伴侣暴力筛查及数字支持性干预的障碍和促进因素。
通过数字问卷对丹麦南部地区接受标准产前护理的孕妇进行亲密伴侣暴力的系统筛查。对筛查呈阳性的孕妇提供与助产士进行3 - 6次视频咨询的机会,并可使用安全计划应用程序。对亲密伴侣暴力筛查呈阳性并参与数字支持性干预的孕妇进行了半结构化定性访谈。
采访了20名孕妇,突出了以下参与的促进因素:数字系统筛查方法是可以接受的,有助于承认亲密伴侣暴力暴露情况,因为与基于风险的面对面筛查相比,女性认为这种方式更私密,且有思考时间。视频咨询非常受欢迎,因为数字方式使关于敏感话题的对话更容易,其灵活性提高了参与度。对医疗保健系统的信任、有受过培训的助产士作为咨询师以及对数字工具的熟悉程度提高了参与度。障碍包括对披露亲密伴侣暴力的担忧、技术问题以及需要一个私密的咨询空间。此外,经历过数字暴力的女性对干预措施的数字性质感到不舒服。安全应用程序被认为效率低下,因为它不能满足女性的需求。
产前护理中针对亲密伴侣暴力的系统数字筛查和支持性视频咨询在孕妇中很受欢迎,因为它提供了更多隐私和灵活性,并便于就敏感话题进行讨论。为了提高参与度,必须解决诸如保密问题、技术挑战以及对私密咨询空间的需求等障碍。将数字工具纳入产前护理可以补充其他支持服务,并增加获得帮助的孕妇比例。