Suppr超能文献

与传统上颌义齿相比,种植体辅助上颌修复体是否能改善患者报告的结局?一项系统评价。

Are patient-reported outcomes improved by implant-assisted maxillary prostheses compared to conventional maxillary dentures? A systematic review.

作者信息

Michaud Pierre-Luc, Talmazov Georgi, Dort Hillary

机构信息

Department of Dental Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Private Practice, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Dent. 2025 Jan;152:105490. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105490. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Edentulism can be treated with conventional complete dentures or implant-assisted prostheses. While two-implant assisted overdentures are superior to conventional mandibular dentures, the effectiveness of maxillary options remains unclear. This systematic review aims to assess whether conventional or implant-assisted maxillary prostheses provide better satisfaction and quality of life for patients with edentulous maxilla.

DATA AND SOURCES

An electronic search was conducted across Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 23, 2024, to find studies comparing satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life in patients using conventional maxillary dentures versus implant-assisted maxillary prostheses.

STUDY SELECTION

Out of 1119 retrieved articles, 1085 were deemed irrelevant after screening, and 34 studies were evaluated for inclusion. Only six studies met the criteria, with the main reason for exclusion being the lack of comparison between new implant prostheses and new conventional dentures, as opposed to old unsatisfactory conventional maxillary dentures. Due to limited sample sizes and high heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible. The literature did not show significant differences in quality of life or satisfaction between conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses, except for patients with pre-treatment preference toward implants.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence supporting the superiority of either conventional or implant-assisted prosthetic options for restoring the edentulous maxilla. Further well-designed clinical studies are needed to compare new conventional and new implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses with different designs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses appear equally successful in restoring the quality of life and satisfaction of patients with an edentulous maxilla. The cost and morbidity associated with implant-assisted prostheses may be greater. A properly made conventional denture can serve as a diagnostic tool to assist treatment planning.

摘要

目的

无牙颌可通过传统全口义齿或种植体支持的修复体进行治疗。虽然两颗种植体支持的覆盖义齿优于传统下颌义齿,但上颌修复方式的有效性仍不明确。本系统评价旨在评估传统或种植体支持的上颌修复体是否能为上颌无牙患者提供更好的满意度和生活质量。

数据与来源

截至2024年5月23日,在Medline(PubMed)、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了电子检索,以查找比较使用传统上颌义齿与种植体支持的上颌修复体的患者的满意度和口腔健康相关生活质量的研究。

研究选择

在检索到的1119篇文章中,筛选后认为1085篇不相关,对34项研究进行了纳入评估。只有6项研究符合标准,排除的主要原因是缺乏新种植修复体与新传统义齿之间的比较,而不是旧的不满意的传统上颌义齿。由于样本量有限和高度异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。文献显示,除了治疗前倾向于种植体的患者外,传统和种植体支持的全上颌修复体在生活质量或满意度方面没有显著差异。

结论

没有证据支持传统或种植体支持的修复方式在上颌无牙修复方面具有优越性。需要进一步设计良好的临床研究来比较不同设计的新传统和新种植体支持的全上颌修复体。

临床意义

传统和种植体支持的全上颌修复体在恢复上颌无牙患者的生活质量和满意度方面似乎同样成功。种植体支持的修复体相关的成本和发病率可能更高。制作精良的传统义齿可作为辅助治疗计划的诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验