UTHealth Institute for Implementation Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Work & Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e088359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088359.
Implementation Mapping (IM) has increasingly been used for the design and/or selection and tailoring implementation strategies to promote the effective translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. IM is a tool for guiding the systematic, iterative, step-by-step design process that helps guide the co-creation of theory-based, evidence-informed implementation strategies. This protocol aims to describe the methods of the planned systematic review that will (1) examine the overall landscape of IM in developing implementation strategies, (2) explore the mechanisms of implementation strategies developed using IM and (3) investigate the use of IM and community engagement in the development of implementation strategies. This review will produce synthesised evidence that will describe how IM has been used in selecting, designing and tailoring implementation strategies, with a focus on implementation mechanism and community engagement.
We will include peer-reviewed original English articles that describe the use of Implementation Mapping or Intervention Mapping to design implementation strategies. We will search Medline Ovid, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science using the following terms: 'Implementation Mapping' and 'Intervention Mapping'. At least two reviewers will independently screen the records to examine the eligibility. After several rounds of consistency testing of data extraction among at least two reviewers and confirming the consistent coding among the reviewer team, one coder will proceed with the data extraction. In case of uncertainty, we will reach a consensus through interactive reviewers' meetings and in consultation with a senior author. We examined the risk of bias in individual studies using the quality assessment tool developed by Hawker in 2002. We will synthesise and present the data by each research aim.
Ethics approval was not required. Findings will be shared via peer-reviewed journals, and data from the included studies will be made openly accessible.
实施映射(Implementation Mapping,IM)越来越多地用于设计和/或选择和定制实施策略,以促进将基于证据的干预措施有效转化为实践。IM 是一种指导系统的、迭代的、逐步设计过程的工具,有助于指导基于理论的、基于证据的实施策略的共同创造。本方案旨在描述计划的系统评价方法,该评价将:(1)检查在制定实施策略中 IM 的总体情况;(2)探索使用 IM 开发的实施策略的机制;(3)调查 IM 的使用情况和社区参与在制定实施策略中的作用。本综述将产生综合证据,描述 IM 在选择、设计和调整实施策略中的使用情况,重点是实施机制和社区参与。
我们将纳入描述使用实施映射或干预映射来设计实施策略的同行评审的英文原创文章。我们将使用以下术语在 Medline Ovid、PsycInfo、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中进行搜索:“Implementation Mapping”和“Intervention Mapping”。至少两名评审员将独立筛选记录以检查合格性。在至少两名评审员之间进行几轮数据提取一致性测试,并确认评审员团队之间的一致编码后,一名编码员将继续进行数据提取。如果存在不确定性,我们将通过互动评审员会议和与资深作者协商达成共识。我们使用 Hawker 于 2002 年开发的质量评估工具检查了单个研究的偏倚风险。我们将根据每个研究目标综合和呈现数据。
不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审期刊分享,并公开提供纳入研究的数据。