Pinto Rogério M, Park Sunggeun Ethan, Miles Rashun, Ong Pei Ni
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 1;2:2633489520985305. doi: 10.1177/2633489520985305. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed in the extant literature. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs.
We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes. We built on Tabak et al.'s narrative review that identified 51 D&I models published up to 2012 and identified 23 D&I models published between 2012 and 2020 from the Health Research & Practice website (16 models) and PubMed database (7 models). Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs.
We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. Few models with strong community content have been introduced since 2009.
This article bridges the community-engaged and D&I research literature by identifying community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models, targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs. We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes, published between 2012 and 2020. Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs. We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. This article identified community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
为回应科学界对基于证据的干预措施（EBI）的采用和推广进行科学理解的需求不断增长的情况，现有文献中提出了众多传播与实施（“D&I”）模型。本综述旨在识别具有潜力的特定社区构建要素，以帮助研究人员在D&I研究中让社区伙伴参与进来或部署EBI。
我们识别出74个针对社区层面变化的D&I模型。我们以塔巴克等人的叙述性综述为基础，该综述识别出截至2012年发表的51个D&I模型，并从健康研究与实践网站（16个模型）和PubMed数据库（7个模型）中识别出2012年至2020年间发表的23个D&I模型。三名编码员独立审查所有74个模型，寻找特定社区的参与构建要素。
我们识别出五个社区参与构建要素：（1） ，（2） ，（3） ，（4） ，以及（5） 。在这74个模型中，20%反映了所有五个构建要素；32%反映了四个；22%反映了三个；20%反映了两个；5%仅反映了一个。自2009年以来，很少有具有强大社区内容的模型被引入。
本文通过识别现有针对社区层面变化的D&I模型中反映的社区参与构建要素，在社区参与研究和D&I研究文献之间架起了桥梁。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
为回应科学界对基于证据的干预措施（EBI）的采用和推广进行科学理解的需求不断增长的情况，已提出众多传播与实施（“D&I”）模型。本综述旨在识别具有潜力的特定社区构建要素，以帮助研究人员在D&I研究中让社区伙伴参与进来或部署EBI。我们识别出74个针对社区层面变化的D&I模型，这些模型发表于2012年至2020年间。三名编码员独立审查所有74个模型，寻找特定社区的参与构建要素。我们识别出五个社区参与构建要素：（1） ，（2） ，（3） ，（4） ，以及（5） 。在这74个模型中，20%反映了所有五个构建要素；32%反映了四个；22%反映了三个；20%反映了两个；5%仅反映了一个。本文识别出在现有针对社区层面变化的D&I模型中反映的社区参与构建要素。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
