社区参与传播与实施模式：一项叙述性综述。
Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.
作者信息
Pinto Rogério M, Park Sunggeun Ethan, Miles Rashun, Ong Pei Ni
机构信息
School of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
出版信息
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 1;2:2633489520985305. doi: 10.1177/2633489520985305. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
BACKGROUND
Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed in the extant literature. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs.
METHODS
We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes. We built on Tabak et al.'s narrative review that identified 51 D&I models published up to 2012 and identified 23 D&I models published between 2012 and 2020 from the Health Research & Practice website (16 models) and PubMed database (7 models). Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs.
RESULTS
We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. Few models with strong community content have been introduced since 2009.
CONCLUSION
This article bridges the community-engaged and D&I research literature by identifying community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models, targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY
Responding to the growing demand for scientific understanding of adoption and uptake of evidence-based interventions (EBIs), numerous dissemination and implementation ("D&I") models have been proposed. This review aimed to identify community-specific constructs with the potential to help researchers engage community partners in D&I studies or deploy EBIs. We identified 74 D&I models targeting community-level changes, published between 2012 and 2020. Three coders independently examined all 74 models looking for community-specific engagement constructs. We identified five community engagement constructs: (1) , (2) , (3) , (4) , and (5) . Of the 74 models, 20% reflected all five constructs; 32%, four; 22%, three; 20%, two; and 5%, only one. This article identified community engagement constructs reflected in existing D&I models targeting community-level changes. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
背景
为回应科学界对基于证据的干预措施（EBI）的采用和推广进行科学理解的需求不断增长的情况，现有文献中提出了众多传播与实施（“D&I”）模型。本综述旨在识别具有潜力的特定社区构建要素，以帮助研究人员在D&I研究中让社区伙伴参与进来或部署EBI。
方法
我们识别出74个针对社区层面变化的D&I模型。我们以塔巴克等人的叙述性综述为基础，该综述识别出截至2012年发表的51个D&I模型，并从健康研究与实践网站（16个模型）和PubMed数据库（7个模型）中识别出2012年至2020年间发表的23个D&I模型。三名编码员独立审查所有74个模型，寻找特定社区的参与构建要素。
结果
我们识别出五个社区参与构建要素：（1） ，（2） ，（3） ，（4） ，以及（5） 。在这74个模型中，20%反映了所有五个构建要素；32%反映了四个；22%反映了三个；20%反映了两个；5%仅反映了一个。自2009年以来，很少有具有强大社区内容的模型被引入。
结论
本文通过识别现有针对社区层面变化的D&I模型中反映的社区参与构建要素，在社区参与研究和D&I研究文献之间架起了桥梁。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
通俗易懂的总结
为回应科学界对基于证据的干预措施（EBI）的采用和推广进行科学理解的需求不断增长的情况，已提出众多传播与实施（“D&I”）模型。本综述旨在识别具有潜力的特定社区构建要素，以帮助研究人员在D&I研究中让社区伙伴参与进来或部署EBI。我们识别出74个针对社区层面变化的D&I模型，这些模型发表于2012年至2020年间。三名编码员独立审查所有74个模型，寻找特定社区的参与构建要素。我们识别出五个社区参与构建要素：（1） ，（2） ，（3） ，（4） ，以及（5） 。在这74个模型中，20%反映了所有五个构建要素；32%反映了四个；22%反映了三个；20%反映了两个；5%仅反映了一个。本文识别出在现有针对社区层面变化的D&I模型中反映的社区参与构建要素。讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。
Zotero 插件