Suppr超能文献

人乳与婴儿配方奶粉的消化命运:体外动态消化和体内小型猪模型得出相似结论。

Human milk vs. Infant formula digestive fate: In vitro dynamic digestion and in vivo mini-piglet models lead to similar conclusions.

机构信息

STLO, L'Institut Agro, INRAE, 35042 Rennes, France; Institut NuMeCan, INRAE, INSERM, Univ Rennes, 35590 Saint Gilles, France.

STLO, L'Institut Agro, INRAE, 35042 Rennes, France.

出版信息

Food Res Int. 2024 Nov;196:115070. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115070. Epub 2024 Sep 10.

Abstract

Infant formula (IF), the only nutritionally adequate substitute for human milk (HM), still needs to be improved to be more biomimetic with HM, including in terms of digestive fate. The latter can be explored using different digestion models. The present study aimed to compare IF and HM digestion using in vivo (mini-piglet) and in vitro (dynamic system, DIDGI®) models. Fresh mature HM was collected and compared with a standard bovine IF. In vivo, 18 Yucatan mini-piglets (24-day-old) received HM or IF and were euthanized 30 min after the last meal. The entire digestive content was collected from the stomach to the colon. In vitro, the same meals were fed to an in vitro dynamic digestion model simulating the term infant at four weeks of age. Digesta were sampled regularly in the gastric and intestinal compartments. Structure (confocal microscopy and laser light scattering) and proteolysis (SDS-PAGE for residual intact proteins, OPA for hydrolysis degree, LC-MS/MS for peptides) were investigated along digestion. The digesta microstructure differed between HM and IF in a similar way between in vitro and in vivo digestion. In vitro gastric proteolysis of caseins and α-lactalbumin was significantly slower for HM than for IF, such as for the early intestinal proteolysis degree. In vitro bioaccessibility of free AAs explained only 30 % of the true ileal digestibility of AAs. Peptide mapping of caseins differed between HM and IF along their digestion. The relative peptide mapping data over six proteins from HM and IF were highly correlated between in vitro and in vivo digestion, particularly at 80 and 120 min of in vitro gastric digestion vs. in vivo stomach data and at 20 and 40 min of in vitro intestinal digestion vs. in vivo proximal jejunum data (r = 0.7-0.9, p < 0.0001, n = 1604). 40 to 50 % of the bioactive peptides identified in vivo were also found in vitro, with a good correlation of their abundances (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001, n = 61). Overall, in vitro and in vivo digestion were in good agreement, both indicating a different digestive fate for HM and IF.

摘要

婴儿配方奶粉(IF)是唯一与母乳(HM)在营养上相当的替代品,但仍需要进一步改进,以使其在消化方面更仿生。可以使用不同的消化模型来探索后者。本研究旨在使用体内(小型猪)和体外(动态系统,DIDGI®)模型比较 IF 和 HM 的消化。收集新鲜成熟的 HM 并与标准牛 IF 进行比较。在体内,18 头 Yucatan 小型猪(24 天大)接受 HM 或 IF,最后一次喂食后 30 分钟安乐死。从胃到结肠收集整个消化内容物。在体外,将相同的膳食喂给模拟 4 周龄婴儿的体外动态消化模型。定期在胃和肠腔中取样。在消化过程中研究结构(共聚焦显微镜和激光光散射)和蛋白水解(残留完整蛋白的 SDS-PAGE、水解度的 OPA、肽的 LC-MS/MS)。HM 和 IF 的消化物微观结构在体内和体外消化中以相似的方式不同。与 IF 相比,HM 的体外胃酪蛋白和α-乳白蛋白的蛋白酶解速度明显较慢,例如早期肠蛋白酶解程度。体外游离氨基酸的生物可及性仅解释了真回肠氨基酸消化率的 30%。HM 和 IF 沿消化过程的酪蛋白肽图谱不同。在体外和体内消化中,来自 HM 和 IF 的六种蛋白质的相对肽图谱数据高度相关,尤其是在体外胃消化 80 和 120 分钟与体内胃数据和体外肠消化 20 和 40 分钟与体内近端空肠数据相比(r=0.7-0.9,p<0.0001,n=1604)。在体内鉴定的 40%至 50%的生物活性肽也在体外发现,其丰度相关性良好(r=0.5,p<0.0001,n=61)。总体而言,体内和体外消化非常吻合,都表明 HM 和 IF 的消化命运不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验