Herzog C, Just V, Berger R, Just M
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986 Mar 15;116(11):331-5.
Sera of 47 patients with serious Staphylococcus aureus infections, 55 patients with septicemias caused by other organisms and 147 healthy controls were examined for teichoic acid antibodies by ELISA, counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) and immunodiffusion (ID). The specificity and the predictive value of positive results for metastatic-septic complications were 100% each for ELISA, 93%/88% for CIE and 87%/80% for ID. The low sensitivity with all three test methods of 50-60% relates to single sera. The indication for prolonged antibiotic treatment should therefore be derived only from the analysis of consecutive serum samples. With 12% of the controls above the cut-off, the ID test seems not a very good screening test.
采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、对流免疫电泳(CIE)和免疫扩散法(ID)检测了47例严重金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者、55例由其他病原体引起败血症的患者以及147名健康对照者血清中的磷壁酸抗体。ELISA检测转移性败血症并发症阳性结果的特异性和预测值均为100%,CIE为93%/88%,ID为87%/80%。三种检测方法对单次血清检测的敏感性较低,为50%-60%。因此,延长抗生素治疗的指征应仅从连续血清样本分析中得出。由于12%的对照者高于临界值,ID检测似乎不是一个很好的筛查试验。