Liu Ting-Hui, Lin Yen-Ting, Wu Jheng-Yan, Huang Po-Yu, Tsai Wen-Wen, Lai Chih-Cheng, Kao Pei-Hsin, Su Kuan-Pin
Department of Psychiatry, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Department of General Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jan;181:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
The high incidence and mortality rates of postoperative delirium (POD) among elderly patients highlights the pressing need for tailored prophylactic strategies. Despite various pharmacologic prophylactic strategies have been reported effective, their overall benefit and safety remain unclear in the geriatric population. Our network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to systematically evaluate and rank the effectiveness of various pharmacological interventions in preventing POD in elderly patients.
We conducted an extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to August 1, 2023. We included RCTs examining pharmacological prophylactic effects of POD in elderly patients. To extract data in alignment with predefined areas of interest, we employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. For secondary outcomes, we evaluated tolerability through all-cause discontinuation or drop-out rates, as well as all-cause mortality.
Our analysis encompassed a total of 44 RCTs involving 11,178 patients. Out of these, 26 RCTs involved comparisons with placebo only. For delirium prevention, the treatment groups receiving atypical antipsychotics (odds ratio (OR) of 0.27 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.12-0.58), haloperidol (OR of 0.42; 95% CI of 0.25-0.71), dexmedetomidine (OR of 0.51 and 95% CI of 0.37-0.71 and melatonergic agents (MMA) (OR of 0.57 and 95% CI of 0.33-0.98) had significantly lower rates of delirium compared to the placebo group. Notably, the atypical antipsychotics ranked as the most effective treatment. For tolerability, no statistically differences in rates of dropout discontinuation and all-cause mortality among groups allocated to the placebo or individual pharmacological treatments.
Based on indirect evidence, our network meta-analysis identified atypical antipsychotics, dexmedetomidine, MMA, and haloperidol as effective in preventing POD in the elderly, with atypical antipsychotics ranking highest. However, it is essential to note that these findings should be confirmed through further RCTs.
老年患者术后谵妄(POD)的高发病率和死亡率凸显了制定针对性预防策略的迫切需求。尽管已报道多种药物预防策略有效,但在老年人群中其总体益处和安全性仍不明确。我们的网状Meta分析(NMA)旨在系统评估和排序各种药物干预措施预防老年患者POD的有效性。
我们对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、PsycINFO和谷歌学术进行了广泛检索,以获取截至2023年8月1日发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们纳入了研究老年患者POD药物预防效果的RCT。为了提取与预定义感兴趣领域一致的数据,我们采用了系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南。主要结局是POD的发生率。对于次要结局,我们通过全因停药或退出率以及全因死亡率评估耐受性。
我们的分析共纳入44项RCT,涉及11178例患者。其中,26项RCT仅涉及与安慰剂的比较。在预防谵妄方面,接受非典型抗精神病药物治疗的组(比值比(OR)为0.27,95%置信区间(CI)为0.12 - 0.58)、氟哌啶醇组(OR为0.42;95%CI为0.25 - 0.71)、右美托咪定组(OR为0.51,95%CI为0.37 - 0.71)和褪黑素能药物(MMA)组(OR为0.57,95%CI为0.33 - 0.98)的谵妄发生率显著低于安慰剂组。值得注意的是,非典型抗精神病药物被列为最有效的治疗方法。在耐受性方面,分配到安慰剂或个别药物治疗组的停药率和全因死亡率在统计学上无差异。
基于间接证据,我们的网状Meta分析确定非典型抗精神病药物、右美托咪定、MMA和氟哌啶醇在预防老年患者POD方面有效,其中非典型抗精神病药物排名最高。然而,必须注意的是,这些发现应通过进一步的RCT加以证实。