• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人首次无诱因癫痫发作后脑电图的诊断价值——一项基于人群的研究。

Diagnostic value of EEG after a first unprovoked seizure in adults - A population-based study.

作者信息

Joelsson Sara, Andersson Klara, Brannefors Petra, Klemetz Samuel, Gärdesmed Lovisa, Wennberg Elisabet, Hedström Anders, Asztely Fredrik, Zelano Johan, Strandberg Joakim

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Neurology, member of ERN Epicare, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Jan;162:110151. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110151. Epub 2024 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110151
PMID:39615259
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a standard investigation after a first unprovoked seizure but the diagnostic value in adults remains unclear. Our objective was to investigate the diagnostic value of EEG after a first unprovoked seizure in a population-based cohort in Gothenburg, Sweden.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based study included adult patients referred by a neurologist for EEG after a first unprovoked seizure from August 2016 - December 2019 in the greater Gothenburg catchment area. In total 520 patients were included and followed in medical records for a median of 4.42 years (range 0.33-6.93). Primary outcome measures were epileptiform activity. Medical records were reviewed for the influence of EEG on clinical management. The frequency of epileptiform activity was calculated and compared in different subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

EEGs were recorded after a median of 70 days from the seizure. In total, 7.7 % had epileptiform activity, and 27.9 % had pathological slowing on their EEG. Seizure recurrence occurred in 33.7 % (29.6-37.8). Epileptiform activity predicted seizure recurrence with a recurrence risk of 82.5 % (70.7-94.3). The sensitivity of epileptiform activity was only 19.2 % (13.6-25.9) but the specificity was 98.0 % (95.9-99.2) and the relative risk of recurrence in presence of such activity was 2.8 (2.3-3.5). The EEG findings resulted in an alteration of diagnosis and/or medication in 4.4 % of the patients. Factors associated with epileptiform activity on EEG were younger age, EEG including sleep recording, generalized onset seizure, shorter time from seizure to EEG and longer duration of EEG recording.

SIGNIFICANCE

The yield of EEG recorded with a longer latency after a first unprovoked seizure in adults was low. However, epileptiform activity highly predicted seizure recurrence and our results suggest that epileptiform activity on EEG could be explored further as a biomarker for defining epilepsy already after a first seizure.

摘要

目的

脑电图(EEG)是首次无诱因癫痫发作后的一项标准检查,但在成年人中的诊断价值仍不明确。我们的目的是在瑞典哥德堡一个基于人群的队列中研究首次无诱因癫痫发作后脑电图的诊断价值。

方法

这项基于人群的回顾性研究纳入了2016年8月至2019年12月在大哥德堡集水区因首次无诱因癫痫发作由神经科医生转诊进行脑电图检查的成年患者。总共纳入了520例患者,并在医疗记录中随访了中位数4.42年(范围0.33 - 6.93年)。主要结局指标是癫痫样活动。审查医疗记录以了解脑电图对临床管理的影响。计算癫痫样活动的频率并在不同亚组分析中进行比较。

结果

癫痫发作后中位数70天进行了脑电图记录。总体而言,7.7%的患者有癫痫样活动,27.9%的患者脑电图有病理慢波。癫痫复发率为33.7%(29.6 - 37.8)。癫痫样活动可预测癫痫复发,复发风险为82.5%(70.7 - 94.3)。癫痫样活动的敏感性仅为19.2%(13.6 - 25.9),但特异性为98.0%(95.9 - 99.2),存在这种活动时复发的相对风险为2.8(2.3 - 3.5)。脑电图检查结果导致4.4%的患者诊断和/或药物治疗发生改变。与脑电图上癫痫样活动相关的因素包括年龄较小、脑电图包括睡眠记录、全面性发作起始、癫痫发作至脑电图检查的时间较短以及脑电图记录时间较长。

意义

成年人首次无诱因癫痫发作后延迟较长时间记录的脑电图阳性率较低。然而,癫痫样活动高度预测癫痫复发,我们的结果表明,脑电图上的癫痫样活动可作为首次发作后定义癫痫的生物标志物进一步探索。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic value of EEG after a first unprovoked seizure in adults - A population-based study.成人首次无诱因癫痫发作后脑电图的诊断价值——一项基于人群的研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Jan;162:110151. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110151. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
How soon should urgent EEG be performed following a first epileptic seizure?首次癫痫发作后,应多快进行紧急 EEG?
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Oct;111:107315. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107315. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
The value of 24-hour video-EEG in evaluating recurrence risk following a first unprovoked seizure: A prospective study.24小时视频脑电图在评估首次无诱因发作后复发风险中的价值:一项前瞻性研究。
Seizure. 2016 Aug;40:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
Yield of epileptiform electroencephalogram abnormalities in incident unprovoked seizures: a population-based study.在偶发性无诱因癫痫发作中,癫痫样脑电图异常的发生率:一项基于人群的研究。
Epilepsia. 2014 Sep;55(9):1389-98. doi: 10.1111/epi.12720. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
5
Value of the early electroencephalogram after a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后早期脑电图的价值。
Clin Electroencephalogr. 2003 Jul;34(3):140-4. doi: 10.1177/155005940303400307.
6
Abnormal electroencephalography in first unprovoked seizure in Rajavithi Hospital.拉贾维蒂医院首次无诱因癫痫发作时的异常脑电图
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Mar;96 Suppl 3:S42-6.
7
Prolonged EEGs in adult patients with a first unprovoked seizure: a prospective pilot study.成人首次无诱因发作患者的延长脑电图:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Epileptic Disord. 2019 Dec 1;21(6):561-566. doi: 10.1684/epd.2019.1110.
8
Early electroencephalography in patients with Emergency Room diagnoses of suspected new-onset seizures: Diagnostic yield and impact on clinical decision-making.急诊室诊断为疑似新发癫痫患者的早期脑电图检查:诊断率及对临床决策的影响
Seizure. 2015 Sep;31:22-6. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
Electroencephalography after a single unprovoked seizure.单次无诱因发作后的脑电图检查
Seizure. 2017 Jul;49:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
10
Optimizing electroencephalogram duration for efficient detection of epileptiform abnormalities in diverse patient groups: a retrospective study.优化脑电图时长以提高不同患者群体中癫痫样异常的检出效率:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03796-9.