Yeardley Roger, Penrose Michael, Montoyo Paola Rodríguez, Ateia Mohamed
Center for Environmental Measurement & Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
ORISE Participant at Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Chemosphere. 2024 Dec;369:143860. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143860. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used as fire suppressants. Due to rising health and environmental concerns, fluorine-free foams (F3) are being developed and tested as safer alternatives. However, the impact of these replacement products on ecologically important earthworms has not been adequately studied. This study addresses this gap by comparing the acute, chronic, and behavioral effects of two F3 formulations, BioEx Ecopol and Angus Fire Jetfoam, with a commonly used PFAS-containing AFFF, Buckeye, on two species of earthworms. Soil treated with BioEx Ecopol and Buckeye at the maximum 3% concentration did not cause significant acute mortality in Eisenia fetida, whereas Angus Fire Jetfoam resulted in 100% mortality at the same concentration. In a 28-day chronic test, weight loss was observed in Dendrobaena veneta worms exposed to soil treated with Angus Fire Jetfoam. Additionally, both Eisenia fetida and Dendrobaena veneta demonstrated almost complete avoidance of soils treated with any of the three foams at 3% concentration, indicating potential ecological effects despite lack of acute toxicity by two of the products. The differences in toxicity are likely due to the distinct chemical compositions and surfactant concentrations in these foams. BioEx Ecopol and Buckeye, despite their differing surfactant mixtures, exhibited lower acute toxicity, whereas Angus Fire Jetfoam's high mortality rate points to a potentially problematic chemical formulation. By understanding the toxicity of current formulations, this study supports the ongoing development and evaluation of new fire suppression products, supporting the creation of safer technologies.
含有全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的水成膜泡沫(AFFF)被广泛用作灭火剂。由于对健康和环境的担忧日益增加,无氟泡沫(F3)正在被开发和测试,作为更安全的替代品。然而,这些替代产品对具有重要生态意义的蚯蚓的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究通过比较两种F3配方(BioEx Ecopol和Angus Fire Jetfoam)与一种常用的含PFAS的AFFF(Buckeye)对两种蚯蚓的急性、慢性和行为影响,填补了这一空白。用BioEx Ecopol和Buckeye以最大3%的浓度处理的土壤,对赤子爱胜蚓没有造成显著的急性死亡率,而Angus Fire Jetfoam在相同浓度下导致了100%的死亡率。在一项为期28天的慢性试验中,暴露于用Angus Fire Jetfoam处理的土壤中的微小双胸蚓出现了体重减轻。此外,赤子爱胜蚓和微小双胸蚓都几乎完全避开了用3%浓度的三种泡沫中的任何一种处理过的土壤,这表明尽管其中两种产品缺乏急性毒性,但仍可能产生生态影响。毒性差异可能是由于这些泡沫中不同的化学成分和表面活性剂浓度。BioEx Ecopol和Buckeye尽管表面活性剂混合物不同,但急性毒性较低,而Angus Fire Jetfoam的高死亡率表明其化学配方可能存在问题。通过了解当前配方的毒性,本研究支持了新型灭火产品的持续开发和评估,有助于创建更安全的技术。