Svensberg Karin, Kaae Susanne, Mottelson Nanna Broch, Persson Christina Ljungberg
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Uppsala, Box 580, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Pharmacy, Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2 2100 København Ø, Denmark.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2025 Feb;21(2):74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
The incorporation of Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) into pharmacy interactions has been tested as an innovative strategy aimed at enhancing patient engagement and addressing personal information needs. However, there is a gap in understanding regarding how QPLs induce or reduce patient activation and contribute to improved medical treatment. The specific aim of the study was therefore to qualitatively describe how pharmacy encounters in which QPL are introduced unfold, in order to identify and discuss relevant interactional mechanisms that induce or reduce patient activation.
The QPL, which includes questions about usage, interaction, side effects, and follow-up, was introduced to patients during pharmacy encounters. Employing a qualitative inductive approach based on principles from conversation analysis (CA), audio-recordings from 56 QPL encounters in community pharmacies were transcribed and thematically analysed.
Most meetings began with a long initiation phase focused on determining which medications to take home. This was followed by an introduction to the QPL and a natural break where the pharmacist left to get the medicines, giving the patient an opportunity to contemplate their needs, as prompted by the QPL. While the QPL itself was not explicitly explained or discussed, the majority of patients asked questions and shared personal information. Even those who were disinterested felt compelled to justify their stance, demonstrating the influence of the norm of reciprocity. However, instances of unsolicited information provision by the pharmacist, were still identified.
This study demonstrates that QPLs can enhance patient activation in pharmacy encounters, even without detailed explanations, but their impact is not straightforward. The presence of the QPL encouraged patients to engage, share personal information, and ask questions. These findings suggest that QPLs can create opportunities for patient involvement, even in brief pharmacy interactions.
将问题提示清单(QPLs)纳入药学互动已作为一项旨在提高患者参与度和满足个人信息需求的创新策略进行了测试。然而,关于QPLs如何诱导或降低患者激活度以及如何有助于改善医疗治疗,目前在理解上存在差距。因此,本研究的具体目的是定性描述引入QPLs的药学服务过程是如何展开的,以便识别和讨论诱导或降低患者激活度的相关互动机制。
在药学服务过程中向患者介绍了包含使用、相互作用、副作用和随访问题的QPL。采用基于会话分析(CA)原则的定性归纳方法,对社区药房56次使用QPL的服务过程的录音进行了转录和主题分析。
大多数服务过程开始时是一个较长的起始阶段,重点是确定带哪些药物回家。接下来是对QPL的介绍以及一个自然的停顿,在此期间药剂师离开去拿药,这让患者有机会根据QPL的提示思考自己的需求。虽然没有明确解释或讨论QPL本身,但大多数患者都提出了问题并分享了个人信息。即使是那些不感兴趣的人也觉得有必要为自己的立场辩护,这表明了互惠规范的影响。然而,仍发现了药剂师主动提供信息的情况。
本研究表明,即使没有详细解释,QPLs也能在药学服务过程中提高患者激活度,但其影响并非直接的。QPL的存在鼓励患者参与、分享个人信息并提出问题。这些发现表明,即使在简短的药学互动中,QPLs也能为患者参与创造机会。