Suppr超能文献

紧密联系:理解印度人畜共患病预防与控制中的“同一健康”网络及参与情况

Ties that bind: understanding One Health networks and participation for zoonoses prevention and control in India.

作者信息

Asaaga Festus A, Shakeer Irfan, Sriram Aditi, Chhotaria Kashish, Dutta Seshadri, Narayanaswamy Darshan, Amankwaa Godfred, Chanda Mohammed M, Hoti Subhash L, Young Juliette C, Purse Bethan V

机构信息

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK.

Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560054, India.

出版信息

One Health Outlook. 2024 Dec 1;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s42522-024-00118-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectoral collaborations as exemplified by the One Health approach, are widely endorsed as pragmatic avenues for addressing zoonotic diseases, but operationalisation remain limited in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). Complexities and competing interests and agendas of key stakeholders and the underlying politico-administrative context can all shape outcomes of collaborative arrangements. Evidence is building that organised collaborations are complex political initiatives where different objectives; individual and institutional agendas need to be reconciled to incentivise collaborations.

METHODS

Drawing on a qualitative network analysis of published sources on 'One Health' stakeholders supplemented with 26 multi-scale (national-state-district level) key-informant interviews (including policymakers, disease managers and public health experts), this paper characterises the fragmented and complex characteristics of institutional networks involved in zoonoses prevention and control in India.

RESULTS

Our results highlight how the local socio-political and institutional contexts interact to modulate how and when collaborations occur (or not), the associated contingencies and stakeholder innovations in circumventing existing barriers (e.g. competing interests, distrust between actors, departmental bureaucracy) to cross-sector collaborations and zoonoses management. Aside from principal actors negotiating common ground in some instance, they also capitalised on political/institutional pressure to subtly 'manipulate' their subordinates as a way of fostering collaboration, especially in instances when the institutional and political stakes are high.

CONCLUSION

Altogether our findings suggest that cross-sectoral collaborations are by-product of political and institutional tinkering as long as individual actors and institutional interests converge and these dynamics must be embraced to embed meaningful and sustainable collaborations in local socio-political and administrative contexts.

摘要

背景

以“同一健康”方法为代表的跨部门合作,作为应对人畜共患病的务实途径得到广泛认可,但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的实施仍然有限。关键利益相关者的复杂性、相互竞争的利益和议程以及潜在的政治行政背景都会影响合作安排的结果。越来越多的证据表明,有组织的合作是复杂的政治举措,其中不同的目标、个人和机构议程需要协调一致,以促进合作。

方法

本文利用对已发表的关于“同一健康”利益相关者的资料进行的定性网络分析,并辅以26次多尺度(国家-邦-地区层面)关键信息访谈(包括政策制定者、疾病管理者和公共卫生专家),描述了印度人畜共患病预防和控制中涉及的机构网络的分散和复杂特征。

结果

我们的结果突出了当地社会政治和机构背景如何相互作用,以调节合作如何以及何时发生(或不发生)、相关的意外情况以及利益相关者在规避现有障碍(如相互竞争的利益、行为者之间的不信任、部门官僚作风)以促进跨部门合作和人畜共患病管理方面的创新。除了主要行为者在某些情况下协商共同点外,他们还利用政治/机构压力巧妙地“操纵”下属,以此促进合作,特别是在机构和政治利害关系重大的情况下。

结论

总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,只要个体行为者和机构利益趋同,跨部门合作就是政治和机构调整的副产品,必须接受这些动态,以便在当地社会政治和行政背景中建立有意义和可持续的合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f1/11608486/a34586bc8ed2/42522_2024_118_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验