Suppr超能文献

实现医疗机构间合作的途径:一项基于实际证据的系统综述。

Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.

机构信息

Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interorganisational collaboration is currently being promoted to improve the performance of NHS providers. However, up to now, there has, to the best of our knowledge, been no systematic attempt to assess the effect of different approaches to collaboration or to understand the mechanisms through which interorganisational collaborations can work in particular contexts.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to (1) explore the main strands of the literature about interorganisational collaboration and to identify the main theoretical and conceptual frameworks, (2) assess the empirical evidence with regard to how different interorganisational collaborations may (or may not) lead to improved performance and outcomes, (3) understand and learn from NHS evidence users and other stakeholders about how and where interorganisational collaborations can best be used to support turnaround processes, (4) develop a typology of interorganisational collaboration that considers different types and scales of collaboration appropriate to NHS provider contexts and (5) generate evidence-informed practical guidance for NHS providers, policy-makers and others with responsibility for implementing and assessing interorganisational collaboration arrangements.

DESIGN

A realist synthesis was carried out to develop, test and refine theories about how interorganisational collaborations work, for whom and in what circumstances.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources were gathered from peer-reviewed and grey literature, realist interviews with 34 stakeholders and a focus group with patient and public representatives.

REVIEW METHODS

Initial theories and ideas were gathered from scoping reviews that were gleaned and refined through a realist review of the literature. A range of stakeholder interviews and a focus group sought to further refine understandings of what works, for whom and in what circumstances with regard to high-performing interorganisational collaborations.

RESULTS

A realist review and synthesis identified key mechanisms, such as trust, faith, confidence and risk tolerance, within the functioning of effective interorganisational collaborations. A stakeholder analysis refined this understanding and, in addition, developed a new programme theory of collaborative performance, with mechanisms related to cultural efficacy, organisational efficiency and technological effectiveness. A series of translatable tools, including a diagnostic survey and a collaboration maturity index, were also developed.

LIMITATIONS

The breadth of interorganisational collaboration arrangements included made it difficult to make specific recommendations for individual interorganisational collaboration types. The stakeholder analysis focused exclusively on England, UK, where the COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges for fieldwork.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing successful interorganisational collaborations is a difficult, complex task that requires significant time, resource and energy to achieve the collaborative functioning that generates performance improvements. A delicate balance of building trust, instilling faith and maintaining confidence is required for high-performing interorganisational collaborations to flourish.

FUTURE WORK

Future research should further refine our theory by incorporating other workforce and user perspectives. Research into digital platforms for interorganisational collaborations and outcome measurement are advocated, along with place-based and cross-sectoral partnerships, as well as regulatory models for overseeing interorganisational collaborations.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019149009.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 11, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

背景

目前正在提倡组织间合作,以提高国民保健制度(NHS)提供者的绩效。然而,据我们所知,迄今为止,还没有人系统地尝试评估不同合作方法的效果,也没有人试图了解组织间合作在特定环境中是如何发挥作用的。

目的

我们的目标是(1)探讨组织间合作文献的主要线索,并确定主要的理论和概念框架,(2)评估关于不同类型的组织间合作如何(或可能不)导致绩效和结果改善的经验证据,(3)了解和借鉴 NHS 证据使用者和其他利益相关者的意见,了解如何以及在何处可以最好地利用组织间合作来支持扭转局面的过程,(4)制定一种组织间合作的分类法,考虑到适合 NHS 提供者背景的不同类型和规模的合作,(5)为 NHS 提供者、政策制定者和其他负责实施和评估组织间合作安排的人员提供循证实践指导。

设计

为了发展、测试和完善关于组织间合作如何运作、为谁运作以及在什么情况下运作的理论,我们进行了一次现实主义综合研究。

数据来源

数据来源包括同行评议文献和灰色文献,以及与 34 名利益相关者的现实主义访谈和与患者和公众代表的焦点小组。

审查方法

最初的理论和想法是从范围综述中收集的,通过对文献进行现实主义综述进行了整理和提炼。一系列利益相关者访谈和焦点小组进一步深入了解了在高绩效的组织间合作中,哪些因素是有效的,以及在哪些情况下有效。

结果

现实主义综述和综合分析确定了有效的组织间合作运作中的关键机制,如信任、信念、信心和风险承受能力。利益相关者分析深化了这一理解,并在此基础上提出了一个新的合作绩效方案理论,其中包括与文化功效、组织效率和技术有效性相关的机制。还开发了一系列可转化的工具,包括诊断调查和合作成熟度指数。

局限性

所包括的组织间合作安排的广泛性使得很难为个别组织间合作类型提出具体建议。利益相关者分析仅关注英国英格兰,在那里,COVID-19 大流行给实地工作带来了挑战。

结论

实施成功的组织间合作是一项困难而复杂的任务,需要大量的时间、资源和精力来实现产生绩效提升的合作运作。高绩效的组织间合作需要建立信任、树立信念和保持信心之间的微妙平衡。

未来的工作

未来的研究应通过纳入其他劳动力和用户的观点进一步完善我们的理论。提倡对组织间合作的数字平台和结果测量进行研究,以及基于地点的和跨部门的伙伴关系,以及监督组织间合作的监管模式。

研究注册

该研究已在国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划中注册,并将在;第 11 卷,第 6 期。请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站,以获取更多项目信息。

基金:该项目由英国国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划资助,并将全文发表于;第 11 卷,第 6 期。请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站,以获取更多项目信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验