Li Shuya, Gu Hong-Qiu, Feng Baoyu, Li Hao, Wang Xuechun, Dong Qiang, Fan Dongsheng, Xu Yun, Zhu Suiqiang, Dai Hongguo, Wei Yan, Wang Ziran, Lu Guozhi, Ma Yutong, Li Zixiao, Wang Yilong, Meng Xia, Zhao Xingquan, Liu Liping, Wang Yongjun
Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Clinical Trial Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lancet Neurol. 2025 Jan;24(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00436-8. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
Intra-arterial prourokinase has been shown to be a promising thrombolytic agent in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Given the global shortage of thrombolytics, we aimed to assess the non-inferiority of intravenous recombinant human prourokinase compared with alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who were ineligible for or who refused endovascular thrombectomy.
PROST-2 was a phase 3, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial conducted at 61 hospitals in China. Patients older than 18 years with acute ischaemic stroke, who were ineligible for or who refused endovascular thrombectomy, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio within 4·5 h of stroke onset to receive intravenous recombinant human prourokinase (15 mg bolus followed by 20 mg infusion within 30 min) or intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg per kg, maximum dose 90 mg; 10% bolus followed by remainder as infusion over 60 min). The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days, assessed via masked review in the intention-to-treat population, with a non-inferiority margin for the risk ratio of 0·93. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 h. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05700591) and is now completed.
Between Jan 29, 2023, and March 14, 2024, 1552 patients were randomly assigned: 775 received recombinant human prourokinase and 777 received alteplase. The primary outcome of a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 at 90 days was reached by 558 (72·0%) of 775 patients in the recombinant human prourokinase group versus 534 (68·7%) of 777 in the alteplase group (risk ratio 1·04 [95% CI 0·98 to 1·10]; p<0·0001 for non-inferiority). The frequency of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 h was lower in the recombinant human prourokinase group than in the alteplase group (two [0·3%] of 770 patients vs ten [1·3%] of 775, risk difference -1·0 percentage points [95% CI -2·1 to -0·1]; p=0·021), as was the incidence of major bleeding at 7 days (four [0·5%] vs 16 [2·1%]; -1·5 percentage points (-2·8 to -0·4); p=0·0072). All-cause mortality within 7 days did not differ between groups (five [0·6%] deaths in the recombinant human prourokinase group vs 13 [1·7%] in the alteplase group; risk difference -1·0 percentage points; 95% CI -2·3 to 0·1]; p=0·060).
In our trial, recombinant human prourokinase was shown to be non-inferior to alteplase for achieving excellent functional outcome, with no difference between groups in safety endpoints. These findings support the use of recombinant human prourokinase as a viable alternative to alteplase for patients with ischaemic stroke who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis therapy but ineligible for or who have refused endovascular thrombectomy.
Tasly Biopharmaceuticals, National Key R&D Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission.
For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
动脉内使用普洛尿激酶已被证明是急性缺血性脑卒中患者一种有前景的溶栓药物。鉴于溶栓药物全球短缺,我们旨在评估静脉注射重组人普洛尿激酶与阿替普酶相比,在不适合或拒绝血管内血栓切除术的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的非劣效性。
PROST-2是一项在中国61家医院进行的3期、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验。年龄大于18岁的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,若不适合或拒绝血管内血栓切除术,在卒中发作4.5小时内按1:1比例随机分配,接受静脉注射重组人普洛尿激酶(15mg静脉推注,随后30分钟内输注20mg)或静脉注射阿替普酶(0.9mg/kg,最大剂量90mg;10%静脉推注,其余在60分钟内输注)。主要疗效结局是在意向性治疗人群中,通过盲态评估得出的90天时改良Rankin量表评分为0或1的患者比例,风险比的非劣效界值为0.93。主要安全结局是36小时内症状性颅内出血的发生率。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05700591),现已完成。
在2023年1月29日至2024年3月14日期间,1552例患者被随机分配:775例接受重组人普洛尿激酶,777例接受阿替普酶。重组人普洛尿激酶组775例患者中有558例(72.0%)在90天时达到改良Rankin量表评分为0或1的主要结局,而阿替普酶组777例中有534例(68.7%)(风险比1.04[95%CI0.98至1.10];非劣效性p<0.0001)。重组人普洛尿激酶组36小时内症状性颅内出血的发生率低于阿替普酶组(770例患者中有2例[0.3%] vs 775例中有10例[1.3%],风险差-1.0个百分点[95%CI-2.1至-0.1];p=0.021),7天时大出血的发生率也是如此(4例[0.5%] vs 16例[2.1%];-1.5个百分点[-2.8至-0.4];p=0.0072)。两组7天内全因死亡率无差异(重组人普洛尿激酶组5例[0.6%]死亡 vs 阿替普酶组13例[1.7%];风险差-1.0个百分点;95%CI-2.3至0.1];p=0.060)。
在我们的试验中,重组人普洛尿激酶在实现良好功能结局方面被证明不劣于阿替普酶,两组在安全终点方面无差异。这些发现支持将重组人普洛尿激酶作为阿替普酶的可行替代药物,用于适合静脉溶栓治疗但不适合或拒绝血管内血栓切除术的缺血性脑卒中患者。
天士力生物制药、国家重点研发计划、国家自然科学基金、中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程、北京市科学技术委员会。
摘要的中文翻译见补充材料部分。