• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前吸烟状况对无症状患者颈动脉内膜切除术预后的影响。

The effect of preoperative smoking status on carotid endarterectomy outcomes in asymptomatic patients.

作者信息

Straus Sabrina, Vootukuru Nishita, Willie-Permor Daniel, Elsayed Nadin, Ross Elsie, Malas Mahmoud

机构信息

Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Learning and Excellence in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (CLEVER), UC San Diego (UCSD), San Diego, CA.

Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):658-663. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.031. Epub 2024 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.031
PMID:39617080
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current medical landscape lacks comprehensive data regarding the impact of preoperative smoking status on both short and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study seeks to elucidate the influence of smoking cessation on in-hospital and long-term outcomes in this patient population.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Vascular Quality Initiative for all asymptomatic patients who underwent CEA from 2016 to 2023. Outcomes were compared across three different smoking status groups: never smoke (NS), current smoker (CS), and quit >30 days ago. Our primary outcomes included in-hospital stroke, death, and myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included 1-year and 3-year death. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the following preoperative factors: age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, coronary artery disease, prior congestive heart failure, renal dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, prior coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention, prior CEA/carotid artery stenting, degree of stenosis, urgency, anesthesia type, and medications.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 85,237 CEA cases with 22,343 NS (26.2%), 41,731 who quit >30 days ago (49.0%) , and 21,163 CS (24.8%). Notably, NS tended to be older and more likely to be female. In contrast, patients who quit >30 days ago were more likely to have comorbidities, including obesity, coronary artery disease, prior congestive heart failure, and CKD, as well as prior procedures. Patients who are CS were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and stenosis of >80%. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, we found no statistical difference for in-hospital stroke, death, myocardial infarction outcomes across the three groups. However, the long-term outcomes revealed quit >30 days ago and CS compared with NS had higher odds of 1-year death (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.5; P < .001; OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; P < .001) and 3-year death (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6; P < .001; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.4-1.7; P < .001), respectively. There was no significant difference in midterm mortality outcomes between those who quit >30 days ago and CS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large national study, we found that smoking status did not emerge as a substantial determinant of adverse short-term outcomes for asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA. However, smoking did adversely affect midterm mortality in these patients. In light of these findings, our study suggests that delaying CEA for smokers may not be warranted. It is crucial to recognize that the complex relationship between smoking and surgical outcomes requires further exploration and validation through additional prospective studies.

摘要

目的

目前的医学领域缺乏关于术前吸烟状况对接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)患者短期和长期预后影响的全面数据。本研究旨在阐明戒烟对该患者群体住院期间及长期预后的影响。

方法

收集2016年至2023年血管质量改进计划中所有接受CEA的无症状患者的数据。在三个不同的吸烟状况组中比较预后:从不吸烟(NS)、当前吸烟者(CS)和戒烟超过30天者。我们的主要结局包括住院期间卒中、死亡和心肌梗死。次要结局包括1年和3年死亡率。我们使用治疗权重的逆概率来平衡以下术前因素:年龄、性别、种族、民族、体重指数、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病、既往充血性心力衰竭、肾功能不全、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、高血压、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术/经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、既往CEA/颈动脉支架置入术、狭窄程度、紧急程度、麻醉类型和药物。

结果

最终分析纳入85237例CEA病例,其中22343例(26.2%)为NS,41731例(49.0%)为戒烟超过30天者,21163例(24.8%)为CS。值得注意的是,NS组患者往往年龄较大且女性居多。相比之下,戒烟超过30天者更可能有合并症,包括肥胖、冠状动脉疾病、既往充血性心力衰竭和慢性肾脏病,以及既往手术史。CS组患者更可能患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病且狭窄程度>80%。经过治疗权重的逆概率分析后,我们发现三组患者在住院期间卒中、死亡、心肌梗死结局方面无统计学差异。然而,长期结局显示,与NS组相比,戒烟超过30天者和CS组1年死亡率(比值比[OR],1.4;95%置信区间[CI],1.2 - 1.5;P <.001;OR,1.4;95% CI,1.2 - 1.6;P <.001)和3年死亡率(OR,1.5;95% CI,1.3 - 1.6;P <.001;OR,1.5;95% CI,1.4 - 1.7;P <.001)的几率更高。戒烟超过30天者和CS组之间的中期死亡率结局无显著差异。

结论

在这项大型全国性研究中,我们发现吸烟状况并非接受CEA的无症状患者不良短期结局的重要决定因素。然而,吸烟确实对这些患者的中期死亡率有不利影响。鉴于这些发现,我们的研究表明,对于吸烟者推迟CEA可能没有必要。必须认识到,吸烟与手术结局之间的复杂关系需要通过更多前瞻性研究进一步探索和验证。

相似文献

1
The effect of preoperative smoking status on carotid endarterectomy outcomes in asymptomatic patients.术前吸烟状况对无症状患者颈动脉内膜切除术预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):658-663. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.031. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Preoperative smoking cessation improves carotid endarterectomy outcomes in asymptomatic carotid stenosis patients.术前戒烟可改善无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉内膜切除术预后。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):650-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.022. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
3
Outcomes following carotid revascularization in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中既往同侧颈动脉支架置入术后行颈动脉血运重建术的患者结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1705-1715.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.024. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Anesthetic choice during transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy affects the risk of myocardial infarction.经颈动脉血管重建术和颈动脉内膜切除术期间的麻醉选择会影响心肌梗死风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
5
Investigation of the weekend effect on perioperative complications and mortality after carotid revascularization.调查颈动脉血运重建术后围手术期并发症和死亡率的周末效应。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1487-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.06.163. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年,与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.
7
Carotid endarterectomy and transcarotid artery revascularization can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.颈动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术可在慢性肾脏病患者中以可接受的发病率和死亡率进行。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
8
Outcomes of carotid revascularization stratified by procedure in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 and dialysis patients.估计肾小球滤过率<30 且透析患者的颈动脉血运重建术按手术分层的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1464-1474.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
9
In-hospital outcomes of transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的院内转归。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.11.029. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Thirty-day stroke/mortality of carotid revascularization in asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed and/or decompensated heart failure exceeds the Society for Vascular Society guideline risks.新诊断和/或失代偿性心力衰竭的无症状患者进行颈动脉血运重建的30天卒中/死亡率超过了血管外科学会指南的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 May;81(5):1104-1111.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.032. Epub 2025 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Seizures Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of 69,479 Patients and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Care.颈动脉内膜切除术后癫痫发作:对69479例患者的综合荟萃分析及围手术期护理的循证建议
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 24;15(1):6. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010006.