Kook Yoonwon, Kim Jee Hung, Jang Ji Soo, Bae Soong June, Baek Seung Ho, Jeong Joon, Choi Joon Young, Shin Dong Seung, Ryu Jai Min, Ahn Sung Gwe
Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Institute for Breast Cancer Precision Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2025 Feb;25(2):164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
For patients who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P), the benefit of adding P to T remains uncertain. We compared survival outcomes according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in patients with pCR after chemotherapy with TP.
Patients who achieved pCR in both the breast and axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess the impact of different adjuvant therapies on RFS and DRFS.
In total, 386 patients were included, with 69 (17.9%) receiving adjuvant TP and 317 (82.1%) receiving adjuvant T alone. At a median follow-up of 49 months, the 3-year RFS rate was 96.1%. There was no significant difference in the 3-year RFS between groups (94.2% in TP and 95.6% in T), with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.15 (95% CI, 0.37-3.55, P = .806). In the clinical node-positive group (n = 294), there was no difference in survival between groups (HR 1.64, 95% CI, 0.58-4.65, P = .35). The multivariate analysis showed no significant predictors of recurrence or distant recurrence, including clinical tumor size, nodal status, ER/PR/HER2 status, and adjuvant radiotherapy receipt. Among 11 patients with brain metastasis after pCR, there was no difference according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.
In patients with pCR who responded to chemotherapy and dual HER2 blockade (TP), the 3-year RFS and brain metastasis-free survival did not differ according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.
对于在接受曲妥珠单抗(T)和帕妥珠单抗(P)新辅助化疗后达到病理完全缓解(pCR)的患者,在T基础上加用P的获益仍不确定。我们比较了接受TP化疗后达到pCR的患者接受辅助抗HER2治疗类型的生存结局。
纳入新辅助化疗后乳腺和腋窝均达到pCR的患者。评估无复发生存期(RFS)和远处无复发生存期(DRFS)。采用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险分析评估不同辅助治疗对RFS和DRFS的影响。
共纳入386例患者,69例(17.9%)接受辅助TP治疗,317例(82.1%)仅接受辅助T治疗。中位随访49个月时,3年RFS率为96.1%。两组间3年RFS无显著差异(TP组为94.2%,T组为95.6%),校正风险比(HR)为1.15(95%CI,0.37 - 3.55,P = 0.806)。在临床淋巴结阳性组(n = 294)中,两组生存无差异(HR 1.64,95%CI,0.58 - 4.65,P = 0.35)。多因素分析显示,包括临床肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、ER/PR/HER2状态和辅助放疗在内,均无复发或远处复发的显著预测因素。在11例pCR后发生脑转移的患者中,根据辅助抗HER2治疗类型无差异。
对于对化疗和双重HER2阻断(TP)有反应的pCR患者,辅助抗HER2治疗类型对3年RFS和无脑转移生存期无差异。