• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从医疗服务提供者和服务接受者角度在SWOT分析框架下对社区心理健康服务的评估:一项案例研究

Evaluation of Community-Based Mental Health Services in the Framework of SWOT Analysis From the Perspective of Health Providers and Service Recipients: A Case Study.

作者信息

Mansuroğlu Sercan, Davut Özge Eri Ş

机构信息

Department of Health Care Services, Kütahya Health Sciences University Kütahya Vocational School, Kütahya, Turkey.

Department of Psychiatry Clinic, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14247. doi: 10.1111/jep.14247.

DOI:10.1111/jep.14247
PMID:39618081
Abstract

AIM

This study is a case study that aims to evaluate community-based mental health services from the perspective of health providers and service recipients through SWOT analysis.

METHODS

This qualitative case study was conducted through in-depth interviews with five healthcare providers providing services in a community mental health centre and five individuals with severe mental disorders receiving services. The data were analysed by content analysis.

FINDINGS

As a result of the content analysis of the data, subthemes were identified under the main themes of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. For service recipients; under the theme of strengths, the subthemes of multidimensional support systems and treatment adherence, and under the theme of weaknesses, the subthemes of insufficient physical environment and insufficient attention were identified. Under the theme of opportunities, the subthemes of awareness, self-confidence, employment/financial gain, sharing/socialization and problem solving were identified, while under the theme of threats, the subthemes of economic constraints and feeling uncomfortable were revealed. For health providers; under the theme of strengths, the subthemes of holistic approach, early intervention and stigma prevention, under the theme of weaknesses, the subthemes of lack of resources, lack of standards, unqualified team members, inadequate professional/in-service trainings were revealed. Under the theme of opportunities, the subthemes of autonomous working environment, support systems and aids, and training programmes were identified, while under the theme of threats, the subthemes of economic constraints, stigma exposure, political deficiencies, staff reluctance/burnout, negative perceptions about the centre, and gettıng complacent were identified.

CONCLUSION

Community-based mental health services contain strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats according to the views of both health providers and service recipients, and the views of the groups overlap with each other within the supply-demand mechanism. It can be said that the effectiveness of community-based mental health services will increase by preventing threats by improving weaknesses and increasing the visibility of opportunities by recognizing strengths.

摘要

目的

本研究是一项案例研究,旨在通过SWOT分析从医疗服务提供者和服务接受者的角度评估社区心理健康服务。

方法

本定性案例研究通过对在社区心理健康中心提供服务的五名医疗服务提供者和五名接受服务的重度精神障碍患者进行深入访谈来开展。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。

结果

通过对数据的内容分析,在优势、劣势、机会和威胁等主要主题下确定了子主题。对于服务接受者而言,在优势主题下,确定了多维支持系统和治疗依从性等子主题;在劣势主题下,确定了物理环境不足和关注不够等子主题。在机会主题下,确定了意识、自信、就业/经济收益、分享/社交和问题解决等子主题;在威胁主题下,揭示了经济限制和感觉不自在等子主题。对于医疗服务提供者而言,在优势主题下,确定了整体方法、早期干预和耻辱预防等子主题;在劣势主题下,揭示了资源缺乏、缺乏标准、团队成员不合格、专业/在职培训不足等子主题。在机会主题下,确定了自主工作环境、支持系统和辅助工具以及培训计划等子主题;在威胁主题下,确定了经济限制、耻辱暴露、政治缺陷、工作人员不情愿/倦怠、对中心的负面看法以及自满等子主题。

结论

根据医疗服务提供者和服务接受者的观点,社区心理健康服务存在优势、劣势、机会和威胁,并且这些群体的观点在供需机制内相互重叠。可以说,通过改进劣势来预防威胁,并通过认识到优势来提高机会的可见性,社区心理健康服务的有效性将会提高。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Community-Based Mental Health Services in the Framework of SWOT Analysis From the Perspective of Health Providers and Service Recipients: A Case Study.从医疗服务提供者和服务接受者角度在SWOT分析框架下对社区心理健康服务的评估:一项案例研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14247. doi: 10.1111/jep.14247.
2
Perspectives of healthcare providers, service users, and family members about mental illness stigma in primary care settings: A multi-site qualitative study of seven countries in Africa, Asia, and Europe.在初级保健环境中心理疾病污名化的医护人员、服务使用者和家属观点:一项在非洲、亚洲和欧洲七个国家的多地点定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 27;16(10):e0258729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258729. eCollection 2021.
3
Caregivers' experiences in helping individuals with severe and enduring mental health challenges integrate into the community: A qualitative descriptive study in Singapore.照顾者帮助有严重和持久精神健康挑战的个体融入社区的体验:新加坡的一项定性描述性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Dec;31(6):1120-1132. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13071. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Lived experiences: a focus group pilot study within the MentALLY project of mental healthcare among European users.生活体验:MENTALLY 项目中欧洲使用者心理健康护理的焦点小组试点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05454-5.
5
Walking with the illness and life: Experience of the community life of people previously under the services of an integrated community mental health service.带病生存与生活:综合社区精神卫生服务使用者的社区生活体验
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Dec;27(6):728-741. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12632. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
6
Are wait lists inevitable in subacute ambulatory and community health services? A qualitative analysis.在亚急性门诊和社区卫生服务中,等候名单是否不可避免?一项定性分析。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):93-99. doi: 10.1071/AH16145.
7
What does 'safe care' mean in the context of community-based mental health services? A qualitative exploration of the perspectives of service users, carers, and healthcare providers in England.在社区心理健康服务背景下,“安全护理”是什么意思?对英格兰的服务使用者、照顾者和医疗保健提供者的观点进行的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11473-3.
8
Mental health workers' perspectives on the implementation of a peer support intervention in five countries: qualitative findings from the UPSIDES study.心理健康工作者对在五个国家实施同伴支持干预措施的看法:UPSIDES 研究的定性结果。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e081963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081963.
9
The blind spots of psychiatric reform in Greece.希腊精神病学改革的盲区。
Psychiatriki. 2024 Jun 19;35(2):99-102. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2024.009. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in South Africa-Senior Stakeholder Perceptions of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats in the Western Cape Province.南非儿童和青少年心理健康服务——西开普省高级利益相关者对优势、劣势、机会和威胁的看法
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 26;10:841. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00841. eCollection 2019.