Le Sant Guillaume, Frouin Antoine, Gachet Lucie, Lacourpaille Lilian, Nordez Antoine, Bataille Emmanuelle, Gaultier Aurélie, Fournier Jean-Pascal
Nantes Université, Movement - Interactions - Performance, MIP, UR 4334, Nantes, France.
School of Physiotherapy, IFM3R, Saint-Sebastien sur Loire, France.
Phys Sportsmed. 2025 Apr;53(2):159-168. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2024.2435256. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
To compare healthcare use and the number of days of sickness benefits between people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury who received physiotherapy before and after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who received physiotherapy after ACLR only. Secondary aim: to measure the association between the volume of preoperative healthcare and post-ACLR recovery.
Each individual's care pathway was extracted from a section of the French National Health Data System (SNDS) database (province: Pays de La Loire). The database was queried for the codes related to sickness benefits and healthcare utilization, including physiotherapy, medical and paramedical visits and procedures, medication, and medical equipment provided up to six months before and eighteen months after the ACLR. (Registry/number: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05737719).
Based on the timing of physiotherapy, two subcohorts were created from the database: 'prehabilitation' ( = 513) for those receiving physiotherapy before and after ACLR; 'no prehabilitation' ( = 630) for those only receiving physiotherapy after ACLR. Before ACLR, healthcare use was higher for the 'prehabilitation' group, including the number of medical visits (3.9 ± 2.3 vs. 3.0 ± 1.9 univariate < 0.001), analgesia (mild opioids 60.4% vs. 49.8% univariate < 0.001), dispensing of medical equipment (85.0% vs. 68.9% univariate < 0.001) and sickness benefit days (52.7 ± 45.6 days vs. 33.2 ± 35.8 days, univariate < 0.001). After ACLR, the 'prehabilitation' group underwent a higher number of physiotherapy sessions (46.8 ± 21.9 sessions vs 35.8 ± 19.0 sessions, < 0.001) but had a similar number of sickness benefit days (94.7 ± 77.8 days vs 87.1 ± 69.9 days, = 0.092). From the multivariate analysis ( = 1143): age, comorbidities, the preoperative number of sickness benefit days, and the number of physiotherapy sessions before ACLR explained 24% of the variance in days of sickness benefits after ACLR.
Prehabilitation was associated with higher healthcare utilization before and after ACLR. Prehabilitation, and other preoperative variables, explained only a part of the number of days of sickness benefits after ACLR.
比较在前后交叉韧带(ACL)重建术(ACLR)前后接受物理治疗的ACL损伤患者与仅在ACLR后接受物理治疗的患者的医疗保健使用情况和疾病津贴天数。次要目的:测量术前医疗保健量与ACLR后恢复之间的关联。
从法国国家卫生数据系统(SNDS)数据库的一部分(省份:卢瓦尔河地区)中提取每个人的护理路径。查询该数据库中与疾病津贴和医疗保健利用相关的代码,包括物理治疗、医疗和辅助医疗就诊及程序、药物治疗以及在ACLR前六个月和后十八个月提供的医疗设备。(注册号/编号:ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05737719)。
根据物理治疗的时间,从数据库中创建了两个亚组:“术前康复”组(n = 513),即那些在ACLR前后接受物理治疗的患者;“无术前康复”组(n = 630),即那些仅在ACLR后接受物理治疗的患者。在ACLR之前,“术前康复”组的医疗保健使用量更高,包括就诊次数(单变量分析:3.9 ± 2.3次对3.0 ± 1.9次,< 0.001)、镇痛(轻度阿片类药物使用比例:60.4%对49.8%,单变量分析 < 0.001)、医疗设备配备(85.0%对68.9%,单变量分析 < 0.001)以及疾病津贴天数(52.7 ± 45.6天对33.2 ± 35.8天,单变量分析 < 0.001)。在ACLR之后,“术前康复”组接受的物理治疗疗程更多(46.8 ± 21.9次对35.8 ± 19.0次,< 0.001),但疾病津贴天数相似(94.7 ± 77.8天对87.1 ± 69.9天,P = 0.092)。多变量分析(n = 1143)显示:年龄、合并症、术前疾病津贴天数以及ACLR前的物理治疗疗程数解释了ACLR后疾病津贴天数方差的24%。
术前康复与ACLR前后更高的医疗保健利用率相关。术前康复以及其他术前变量仅解释了ACLR后疾病津贴天数的一部分。