肢体对称指数可能高估前交叉韧带损伤后的膝关节功能。
Limb Symmetry Indexes Can Overestimate Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
作者信息
Wellsandt Elizabeth, Failla Mathew J, Snyder-Mackler Lynn
出版信息
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 May;47(5):334-338. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7285. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Study Design Prospective cohort. Background The high risk of second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries after return to sport highlights the importance of return-to-sport decision making. Objective return-to-sport criteria frequently use limb symmetry indexes (LSIs) to quantify quadriceps strength and hop scores. Whether using the uninvolved limb in LSIs is optimal is unknown. Objectives To evaluate the uninvolved limb as a reference standard for LSIs utilized in return-to-sport testing and its relationship with second ACL injury rates. Methods Seventy athletes completed quadriceps strength and 4 single-leg hop tests before anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and 6 months after ACLR. Limb symmetry indexes for each test compared involved-limb measures at 6 months to uninvolved-limb measures at 6 months. Estimated preinjury capacity (EPIC) levels for each test compared involved-limb measures at 6 months to uninvolved-limb measures before ACLR. Second ACL injuries were tracked for a minimum follow-up of 2 years after ACLR. Results Forty (57.1%) patients achieved 90% LSIs for quadriceps strength and all hop tests. Only 20 (28.6%) patients met 90% EPIC levels (comparing the involved limb at 6 months after ACLR to the uninvolved limb before ACLR) for quadriceps strength and all hop tests. Twenty-four (34.3%) patients who achieved 90% LSIs for all measures 6 months after ACLR did not achieve 90% EPIC levels for all measures. Estimated preinjury capacity levels were more sensitive than LSIs in predicting second ACL injuries (LSIs, 0.273; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.010, 0.566 and EPIC, 0.818; 95% CI: 0.523, 0.949). Conclusion Limb symmetry indexes frequently overestimate knee function after ACLR and may be related to second ACL injury risk. These findings raise concern about whether the variable ACL return-to-sport criteria utilized in current clinical practice are stringent enough to achieve safe and successful return to sport. Level of Evidence Prognosis, 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(5):334-338. Epub 29 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7285.
研究设计
前瞻性队列研究。背景:恢复运动后前交叉韧带(ACL)二次损伤的高风险凸显了恢复运动决策的重要性。目的:恢复运动标准通常使用肢体对称指数(LSIs)来量化股四头肌力量和单腿跳成绩。在LSIs中使用未受伤肢体是否最佳尚不清楚。目的:评估未受伤肢体作为恢复运动测试中使用的LSIs的参考标准及其与ACL二次损伤率的关系。方法:70名运动员在进行前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)前及ACLR后6个月完成了股四头肌力量测试和4项单腿跳测试。每项测试的肢体对称指数将ACLR后6个月时患侧肢体的测量值与ACLR后6个月时未患侧肢体的测量值进行比较。每项测试的估计伤前能力(EPIC)水平将ACLR后6个月时患侧肢体的测量值与ACLR前未患侧肢体的测量值进行比较。对ACLR后的二次ACL损伤进行了至少2年的随访。结果:40名(57.1%)患者在股四头肌力量和所有单腿跳测试中达到了90%的LSIs。只有20名(28.6%)患者在股四头肌力量和所有单腿跳测试中达到了90%的EPIC水平(将ACLR后6个月时的患侧肢体与ACLR前的未患侧肢体进行比较)。24名(34.3%)在ACLR后6个月所有测量指标均达到90% LSIs的患者在所有测量指标上未达到90%的EPIC水平。在预测二次ACL损伤方面,估计伤前能力水平比LSIs更敏感(LSIs,0.273;95%置信区间[CI]:0.010,0.566;EPIC,0.818;95% CI:0.523,0.949)。结论:肢体对称指数经常高估ACLR后的膝关节功能,可能与ACL二次损伤风险有关。这些发现引发了对当前临床实践中使用的可变ACL恢复运动标准是否足够严格以实现安全、成功恢复运动的担忧。证据水平:预后,2b。《运动物理治疗杂志》2017年;47(5):334 - 338。2017年3月29日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7285 。
相似文献
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017-5
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019-2-15
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017-9-15
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017-9-16
引用本文的文献
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025-8-30
Sports Health. 2025-6-23
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025-8
Front Sports Act Living. 2025-5-9
本文引用的文献
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014-10
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012-3-8
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011-9-20
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011-2-2