Cha Soo Min, Ga In Ho, Kim Yong Hwan, Kim Seung Won
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Regional Rheumatoid and Degenerative Arthritis Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
J Wrist Surg. 2023 Nov 7;13(6):508-515. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776353. eCollection 2024 Dec.
We hypothesized a treatment guideline for ulna/radius nonunion after failed surgical treatment and propose to verify it in a prospective study. Herein, we report our preliminary findings and review the current trend. Six patients who met the criteria were retrospectively investigated, and we further categorized "nonunion of both the radius/ulna" into four subcategories. For hypertrophic nonunion of the radius, but with stability maintained by a plate, we only reinforced the mechanical stability of the ulna (osteosynthesis, treatment option 1). In oligo- or atrophic nonunion of the radius with stability maintained by a plate, we added cancellous or tricortical bone grafts to the radius after osteosynthesis of the ulna (treatment option 2). In the presence of definitive pseudomotion of the radius (no stability), we performed revision osteosynthesis for the radius only, without (treatment option 3) or with bone graft (treatment option 4). Two, one, one, and two patients had corresponding treatment options of 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. At a mean postoperative time of 4.3 months, all radii and ulnas showed union. At the final follow-up, clinical outcomes in terms of the range of motion and VAS (visual analog scale)/DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) scores were satisfactory. We are currently conducting a prospective trial to verify the hypothesized guidelines. For both types of radius/ulna nonunion, first, if the stability of the radius was good, we compared the final outcomes with or without revision osteosynthesis for the radius, in addition to osteosynthesis for the ulna. Second, if stability was absent in the radius, we compared the final outcomes with or without osteosynthesis of the ulna, in addition to revision osteosynthesis of the radius. The treatment guidelines for rare nonunion after failed surgical treatment of both the distal radius/ulna were suggested according to the "concept of stability" based on the principles of fracture treatment. This hypothesis could be used to guide prospective studies of revision surgery for nonunion of both the radius and ulna. Level IV, retrospective case series.
我们针对手术治疗失败后的尺骨/桡骨骨不连提出了一项治疗指南,并建议在一项前瞻性研究中对其进行验证。在此,我们报告我们的初步研究结果并回顾当前趋势。对6例符合标准的患者进行了回顾性调查,我们进一步将“桡骨/尺骨双骨骨不连”分为四个亚类。对于桡骨肥大性骨不连,但通过钢板维持稳定,我们仅加强尺骨的机械稳定性(骨固定术,治疗方案1)。对于桡骨寡营养或萎缩性骨不连且通过钢板维持稳定,我们在尺骨进行骨固定术后,在桡骨处添加松质骨或三层皮质骨移植(治疗方案2)。在桡骨存在明确假关节活动(无稳定性)的情况下,我们仅对桡骨进行翻修骨固定术,不进行(治疗方案3)或进行植骨(治疗方案4)。分别有2例、1例、1例和2例患者采用了相应的治疗方案1、2、3和4。术后平均4.3个月时,所有桡骨和尺骨均显示愈合。在最终随访时,就活动范围和视觉模拟评分(VAS)/上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)而言,临床结果令人满意。我们目前正在进行一项前瞻性试验以验证所假设的指南。对于两种类型的桡骨/尺骨骨不连,首先,如果桡骨稳定性良好,除了对尺骨进行骨固定术外,我们比较了对桡骨进行或不进行翻修骨固定术的最终结果。其次,如果桡骨缺乏稳定性,除了对桡骨进行翻修骨固定术外,我们比较了对尺骨进行或不进行骨固定术的最终结果。根据骨折治疗原则的“稳定性概念”,提出了桡骨远端/尺骨手术治疗失败后罕见骨不连的治疗指南。这一假设可用于指导桡骨和尺骨骨不连翻修手术的前瞻性研究。四级,回顾性病例系列。