• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下磨片手术联合三角纤维软骨复合体清创术与尺骨短缩骨干截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的随机临床试验

Combined Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure and Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement versus Ulnar Shortening Diaphyseal Osteotomy in Management of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

El-Tayar Ahmed, El-Ghandour Samir, Ghazal Adel, Rakha Ibrahim, Sallam Asser

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Suez, Egypt.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma, Faculty of Medicine, Suez University, Suez, Egypt.

出版信息

J Wrist Surg. 2023 Nov 7;13(6):500-507. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776399. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1776399
PMID:39619457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11606677/
Abstract

The literature presents great challenge in comparing the arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) versus ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) in the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS).  We aimed primarily to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of AWP with triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) debridement versus USO in the management of UIS.  The study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial including 43 patients with UIS whose ulna variance was less than 4 mm. Patients were randomly allocated to either the AWP group (21 patients) who underwent AWP and TFCC debridement or the USO group (22 patients) who underwent diaphyseal USO. Patients were followed up for at least 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the Modified Mayo Wrist (MMW) score. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, the mean operative time, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were our secondary outcomes.  Radiological correction of variance was achieved in all patients. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the AWP group. The postoperative MMW and DASH scores were better in the AWP group than in the USO group. Fewer complications occurred in the AWP group (1 of 21 patients) compared with the USO group (3 of 22 patients).  AWP with TFCC debridement is a reliable and safe method for the management of UIS with a positive variance of less than 4 mm with better clinical and functional results than diaphyseal USO.  Therapeutic type II.

摘要

在比较关节镜下软骨盘手术(AWP)与尺骨短缩截骨术(USO)治疗尺骨撞击综合征(UIS)方面,文献提出了巨大挑战。我们的主要目的是比较AWP联合三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)清创术与USO治疗UIS的临床和功能结果。该研究作为一项随机临床试验进行,纳入了43例尺骨变异小于4毫米的UIS患者。患者被随机分配至接受AWP和TFCC清创术的AWP组(21例患者)或接受骨干USO的USO组(22例患者)。对患者进行了至少12个月的随访。主要结局指标是改良梅奥腕关节(MMW)评分。手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分、平均手术时间、术后并发症和患者满意度是我们的次要结局指标。所有患者均实现了变异的放射学矫正。AWP组的平均手术时间明显更短。AWP组术后的MMW和DASH评分优于USO组。与USO组(22例患者中的3例)相比,AWP组发生的并发症更少(21例患者中的1例)。AWP联合TFCC清创术是治疗变异小于4毫米的UIS的一种可靠且安全的方法,其临床和功能结果优于骨干USO。治疗类型II。

相似文献

1
Combined Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure and Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Debridement versus Ulnar Shortening Diaphyseal Osteotomy in Management of Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.关节镜下磨片手术联合三角纤维软骨复合体清创术与尺骨短缩骨干截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的随机临床试验
J Wrist Surg. 2023 Nov 7;13(6):500-507. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776399. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy as a Surgical Treatment for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.关节镜下腕骨切除术与尺骨缩短截骨术治疗特发性尺骨撞击综合征的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.306. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
Algorithm-Guided Treatment of Ulna Impaction Syndrome: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Ulna Shortening Osteotomy and Wafer Procedure.算法引导下的尺骨撞击综合征治疗:尺骨短缩截骨术和骨片切除术的10年随访研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 7;13(13):3972. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133972.
4
A comparison of combined arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and arthroscopic wafer distal ulna resection versus arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnocarpal abutment syndrome.关节镜下三角纤维软骨复合体清创联合关节镜下尺骨远端薄片切除术与关节镜下三角纤维软骨复合体清创联合尺骨短缩截骨术治疗尺腕撞击综合征的比较
Arthroscopy. 2004 Apr;20(4):392-401. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.013.
5
Ulna shortening osteotomy versus arthroscopic wafer procedure in the treatment of ulnocarpal impingement syndrome.尺骨缩短截骨术与关节镜下薄骨片切除术治疗尺腕撞击综合征。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Apr;40(2):156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Ulnar shortening osteotomy vs. wafer resection for ulnar impaction syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.尺骨缩短截骨术与骨片切除术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106725. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
A comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy alone versus combined arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome.尺骨缩短截骨术与关节镜下三角纤维软骨复合体清理联合尺骨缩短截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的比较。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Sep;3(3):184-90. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.3.184. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
8
Arthroscopic wafer procedure versus ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节镜下薄片切除术与尺骨缩短截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Feb 20;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04611-4.
9
Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.关节镜下腕骨切除术与尺骨缩短截骨术治疗特发性尺骨撞击综合征:一项随机对照试验。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Aug;47(8):745-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
10
The Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair Versus Debridement for Chronic Unstable Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears in Patients Undergoing Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy.尺骨短缩截骨术治疗慢性不稳定三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂患者时,关节镜下修复与清创的疗效比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 May;41(5):615-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.关节镜下腕骨切除术与尺骨缩短截骨术治疗特发性尺骨撞击综合征:一项随机对照试验。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Aug;47(8):745-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
Ulna shortening osteotomy versus arthroscopic wafer procedure in the treatment of ulnocarpal impingement syndrome.尺骨缩短截骨术与关节镜下薄骨片切除术治疗尺腕撞击综合征。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Apr;40(2):156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Ulnar shortening osteotomy as a treatment of symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome after malunited distal radius fractures.尺骨短缩截骨术治疗桡骨远端骨折畸形愈合后症状性尺骨撞击综合征
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 May;140(5):681-695. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03374-x. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure Versus Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy as a Surgical Treatment for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.关节镜下腕骨切除术与尺骨缩短截骨术治疗特发性尺骨撞击综合征的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.306. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
5
Arthroscopic Management of Ulnocarpal Impaction Syndrome and Ulnar Styloid Impaction Syndrome.尺腕撞击综合征和尺骨茎突撞击综合征的关节镜治疗
Hand Clin. 2017 Nov;33(4):639-650. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.07.002.
6
[Arthroscopic partial resection of the ulnar head for ulnocarpal decompression].[关节镜下尺骨头部分切除术用于尺腕关节减压]
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Aug;28(4):263-9. doi: 10.1007/s00064-016-0454-8. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
7
Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy: Are Complications Under Reported?尺骨短缩截骨术:并发症是否报告不足?
J Hand Microsurg. 2015 Dec;7(2):276-82. doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0201-7. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
How does ulnar shortening osteotomy influence morphologic changes in the triangular fibrocartilage complex?尺骨短缩截骨术如何影响三角纤维软骨复合体的形态变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3489-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3854-9. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
9
Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Ulnar Shortening vs. Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure.尺骨撞击综合征:尺骨短缩术与关节镜下磨除术对比
J Wrist Surg. 2014 May;3(2):98-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375966.
10
Clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcomes after ulnar shortening osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study.尺骨短缩截骨术后的临床、影像学及关节镜检查结果:一项长期随访研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Dec;37(12):2468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.09.011.