Sareila Hanna, Kurppa Kalle, Huhtala Heini, Laurikka Pilvi, Arnala Sanna, Koskela Tuomas, Kaukinen Katri, Kivelä Laura
Celiac Disease Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Hatanpää Health Care Centre, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan;60(1):20-27. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2431628. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Diagnosis of coeliac disease based on serology only has been allowed since 2018 in Finland for adults meeting specific criteria. We studied the patient experiences and perceptions of this novel diagnostic option.
Altogether 194 adult patients were questioned on socio-demographic and health-related characteristics, quality of life and various coeliac disease-related issues. The results were compared between patients diagnosed with intestinal biopsy or based on serology only.
Altogether 69 (36%) of the patients were diagnosed without duodenal biopsies. They were younger (median 43 vs. 51 years, = 0.046), diagnosed more recently (2021 vs. 2020, < 0.001) and more often in primary health care (78% vs. 43%, = 0.001), had fewer esophageal symptoms at diagnosis (17% vs. 30%, = 0.046) and considered the diagnostic process easier (49% vs. 30%, = 0.032) than those diagnosed by duodenal biopsy ( = 125). The no-biopsy group received less often dietician follow-up (4% vs. 17%, = 0.012), reported more persistent symptoms (36% vs. 21%, = 0.026) and experienced more stress due to the diet (68% vs. 47%, = 0.039). Symptom persistence or stress were not associated with year of diagnosis or dietician follow-up. The groups were comparable in socio-economic characteristics, general health, quality of life, diagnostic delay, dietician guidance at diagnosis, and dietary adherence.
The non-invasive approach resulted in de-centralized diagnosis and easier patient-experienced diagnostic process of coeliac disease, but was associated with increased risk for persistent symptoms and stress due to gluten-free diet. These results highlight the significance of appropriate patient guidance and support regardless of the diagnostic strategy.
自2018年起,芬兰允许仅基于血清学对符合特定标准的成年人进行乳糜泻诊断。我们研究了患者对这一新型诊断方法的体验和认知。
共对194名成年患者进行了社会人口学和健康相关特征、生活质量以及各种乳糜泻相关问题的询问。对通过肠道活检或仅基于血清学诊断的患者结果进行了比较。
共有69名(36%)患者未进行十二指肠活检而被诊断。与通过十二指肠活检诊断的患者(n = 125)相比,他们更年轻(中位年龄43岁对51岁,P = 0.046),诊断时间更近(2021年对2020年,P < 0.001),更多在初级卫生保健机构诊断(78%对43%,P = 0.001),诊断时食管症状较少(17%对30%,P = 0.046),且认为诊断过程更轻松(49%对30%,P = 0.032)。未活检组接受营养师随访的频率较低(4%对17%,P = 0.012),报告有持续症状的更多(36%对21%,P = 0.026),且因饮食而经历更多压力(68%对47%,P = 0.039)。症状持续或压力与诊断年份或营养师随访无关。两组在社会经济特征、总体健康、生活质量、诊断延迟、诊断时的营养师指导以及饮食依从性方面具有可比性。
这种非侵入性方法导致了乳糜泻诊断的去中心化以及患者体验更轻松的诊断过程,但与因无麸质饮食导致的持续症状和压力风险增加相关。这些结果凸显了无论诊断策略如何,适当的患者指导和支持的重要性。