Hughes David
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8651. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8651. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
Ubels and van Raaij provide a valuable account of the operation of novel hospital/medical specialist enterprise (MSE) contracts in a Dutch healthcare system shaped by market reform. However, their analytical distinction between the separate domains of contractual and relational governance frames the contractual domain more narrowly than does the relational contract theory widely deployed in socio-legal studies. The authors' conclusion that contract plays little or no part in governing relations between hospitals and MSEs leads them to underplay a wider realm of contractual practices that develop in the shadow of the written contract. Apparent non-use of contracts in favour of shared planning, compromise and extra-legal solutions only takes the form it does because of the potential application of the available legal framework. Larger qualitative field studies involving a more extensive combination of interviews and observations may be needed to gain fuller insights into the relational dimensions of the contracting process.
于贝尔斯和范拉伊对新型医院/医学专家企业(MSE)合同在受市场改革影响的荷兰医疗体系中的运作进行了有价值的阐述。然而,他们在合同治理和关系治理不同领域之间的分析区分,对合同领域的界定比社会法律研究中广泛采用的关系合同理论更为狭隘。作者得出的结论是,合同在医院与MSEs之间的关系治理中作用甚微或毫无作用,这导致他们低估了在书面合同阴影下发展起来的更广泛的合同实践领域。表面上不使用合同而倾向于共同规划、妥协和法外解决方案,只是因为现有法律框架的潜在应用才呈现出这种形式。可能需要进行更大规模的定性实地研究,将访谈和观察更广泛地结合起来,以便更全面地洞察合同签订过程中的关系维度。