Campbell Timothy, Hunt Trevor C, Li Ashley, Cheng Zijing, Malshy Kamil, Doersch Karen, Bandari Jathin
Department of Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 668, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
World J Urol. 2024 Dec 2;43(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05375-6.
Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a morbid and often lethal condition characterized by a paucity of clinical data. Beyond a detailed risk categorization system, it is unclear if genitourinary (GU) sites (bladder/prostate, paratesticular, female organs) have outcomes distinct from non-GU sites. This study pools primary data from phase-3 clinical trials involving pediatric RMS to evaluate this question.
We obtained primary data from three Children's Oncology Group pediatric RMS trials (NCT00075582, NCT00354835, NCT00354744) evaluating low- (LR), intermediate- (IMR), and high risk (HR) Pediatric RMS. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with Event-Free Survival (EFS) defined per protocol specifications.
599 subject records were included in the analysis (111 GU RMS, 488 non-GU RMS). For subjects with GU RMS, overall survival (OS) was superior to non-GU RMS (HRR 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.87], p = 0.009). In this same group, EFS superiority was not statistically significant compared to non-GU RMS (HRR 0.88 [95% CI, 0.63-1.22], p = 0.43). In the LR population, GU primary site was associated with improved OS that was not statistically significant (HRR 0.37 [95% CI 0.07-1.84], p = 0.21) and less favorable EFS (HRR 2.84 [95% CI, 1.13-7.12], p = 0.02).
In RMS, a GU primary site is linked to improved OS compared to non-GU sites, although LR GU RMS shows less favorable EFS. Our findings reinforce the association between GU primary sites and better OS outcomes in RMS, warranting further investigation into the surrogacy of EFS for OS in GU RMS.
Not applicable.
小儿横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)是一种严重且往往致命的疾病,临床数据匮乏。除了详细的风险分类系统外,尚不清楚泌尿生殖系统(GU)部位(膀胱/前列腺、睾丸旁、女性器官)的预后是否与非GU部位不同。本研究汇总了涉及小儿RMS的3期临床试验的原始数据,以评估这一问题。
我们从三项儿童肿瘤学组小儿RMS试验(NCT00075582、NCT00354835、NCT00354744)中获取了原始数据,这些试验评估低危(LR)、中危(IMR)和高危(HR)小儿RMS。使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,无事件生存期(EFS)根据方案规范定义。
599份受试者记录纳入分析(111例GU RMS,488例非GU RMS)。对于GU RMS受试者,总生存期(OS)优于非GU RMS(风险比[HRR]0.55[95%置信区间,0.35 - 0.87],p = 0.009)。在同一组中,与非GU RMS相比,EFS优势无统计学意义(HRR 0.88[95%置信区间,0.63 - 1.22],p = 0.43)。在LR人群中,GU原发部位与改善的OS相关,但无统计学意义(HRR 0.37[95%置信区间0.07 - 1.84],p = 0.21),且EFS较差(HRR 2.84[95%置信区间,1.13 - 7.12],p = 0.02)。
在RMS中,与非GU部位相比,GU原发部位与改善的OS相关,尽管LR GU RMS的EFS较差。我们的研究结果强化了GU原发部位与RMS更好的OS结局之间的关联,有必要进一步研究GU RMS中EFS作为OS替代指标的情况。
不适用。