Ojo Omorogieva, Boateng Joshua, Pacella Rosana, Hanrahan Ann, Essex Ryan, Dibley Lesley
Institute for Lifecourse Development, Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, Old Royal Naval College, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
School of Science, University of Greenwich, Medway Campus, Kent, UK.
Endocr Pract. 2025 Mar;31(3):380-389. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.11.010. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
The objective of this scoping review is to explore the experiences of patients' and healthcare practitioners on the factors that influence the care and management of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs).
Levac et al's 6-stage framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews, guided the review. The SPIDER tool was used to define key elements of the review question. Searches for relevant articles were conducted in electronic databases (PUBMED, CINAHL, AMED, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PsycINFO), Google Scholar, and hand searches of reference lists.
Eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Three themes were identified: Communication and Education about DFUs; Challenges of managing DFUs; and Barriers to treatment and management. The themes are presented as a narrative synthesis.
Inadequate knowledge of diabetic foot care by patients and inconsistent communication by healthcare professionals were primary factors affecting the effective management of diabetes-related foot ulcers. Consistent, patient-focused education that is supported by knowledgeable health care professionals should form the foundation of effective diabetic foot ulcer care.
本范围综述的目的是探讨患者和医疗保健从业者在影响糖尿病相关足部溃疡(DFU)护理和管理的因素方面的经历。
Levac等人的6阶段框架以及系统评价和元分析扩展的首选报告项目用于指导本综述。SPIDER工具用于定义综述问题的关键要素。在电子数据库(PUBMED、CINAHL、AMED、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和PsycINFO)、谷歌学术以及参考文献列表的手工检索中搜索相关文章。
8篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述。确定了三个主题:关于DFU的沟通与教育;DFU管理的挑战;以及治疗和管理的障碍。这些主题以叙述性综述的形式呈现。
患者对糖尿病足护理的知识不足以及医疗保健专业人员沟通不一致是影响糖尿病相关足部溃疡有效管理的主要因素。由知识渊博的医疗保健专业人员支持的、以患者为中心的持续教育应构成有效糖尿病足溃疡护理的基础。