Panchamia Jason K, Smith Hugh M, Sanchez-Sotelo Joaquin, Vinsard Patrice A, Duncan Chris M, Njathi-Ori Catherine W, Larson Dirk R, Esper Ronda N, Sperling John W, Jacob Adam K, Amundson Adam W
Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Sep;34(9):2178-2189. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.051. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
Continuous interscalene catheters extend analgesia beyond 24 hours but are resource-intensive, while the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for single-injection interscalene blocks (ISBs) remains uncertain. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the analgesic efficacy, quality of recovery, and treatment costs between interscalene nerve block using either an indwelling catheter or single shot block using liposomal bupivacaine, in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.
In this single-center, parallel, unblinded, randomized clinical trial, 83 patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were assigned to either a continuous interscalene catheter group (n = 44) or a single-injection liposomal bupivacaine ISB group (n = 39). The interscalene catheter group received a 15-20 mL bolus of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% bupivacaine HCl at 8 mL/h for 69 hours. The single-injection interscalene group received 10 mL (133 mg) liposomal bupivacaine with 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine HCl. The primary outcome was pain at rest 24 hours postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid consumption, complications, quality of recovery, and a time-driven activity-based cost analysis through postoperative day (POD) 3.
There was no significant difference in median pain scores at 24 hours between the continuous interscalene catheter group and the single-injection liposomal bupivacaine group (1.0 [0.0, 2.0] vs. 1.0 [0.0, 3.0]; P = .433). Comparable analgesia was observed through postoperative POD 3, with no differences in opioid consumption or quality of recovery. No serious adverse events were reported; however, 16% of patients in the continuous catheter group experienced dislodgement or leakage. Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a 28% reduction in costs compared to the continuous catheter approach.
Single-injection ISB with liposomal bupivacaine provides comparable analgesia to continuous interscalene catheters through postoperative POD 3 while offering better value in the perioperative management of shoulder arthroplasty patients.
连续肌间沟导管可使镇痛时间延长超过24小时,但资源消耗大,而脂质体布比卡因用于单次注射肌间沟阻滞(ISB)的疗效仍不确定。本研究的目的是比较在接受肩关节置换术的患者中,留置导管的肌间沟神经阻滞与使用脂质体布比卡因单次注射阻滞的镇痛效果、恢复质量和治疗成本。
在这项单中心、平行、非盲、随机临床试验中,83例接受初次肩关节置换术的患者被分配到连续肌间沟导管组(n = 44)或单次注射脂质体布比卡因ISB组(n = 39)。肌间沟导管组先给予15 - 20 mL的0.5%盐酸布比卡因推注,然后以8 mL/h的速度持续输注0.2%盐酸布比卡因69小时。单次注射肌间沟组接受10 mL(133 mg)脂质体布比卡因加5 mL 0.5%盐酸布比卡因。主要结局是术后24小时静息时的疼痛。次要结局包括疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗量、并发症、恢复质量以及直至术后第3天的时间驱动的基于活动的成本分析。
连续肌间沟导管组和单次注射脂质体布比卡因组在术后24小时的中位疼痛评分无显著差异(1.0 [0.0, 2.0] 对 1.0 [0.0, 3.0];P = 0.433)。术后至第3天观察到类似的镇痛效果,阿片类药物消耗量或恢复质量无差异。未报告严重不良事件;然而,连续导管组16%的患者出现导管移位或渗漏。与连续导管方法相比,脂质体布比卡因使成本降低了28%。
脂质体布比卡因单次注射ISB在术后至第3天提供与连续肌间沟导管相当的镇痛效果,同时在肩关节置换术患者的围手术期管理中具有更好的价值。