• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓麻醉下钬激光前列腺剜除术后当日出院:与全身麻醉的倾向评分匹配比较

Same-day Discharge Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison With General Anesthesia.

作者信息

Haehn Daniela A, Chadha Ryan M, Porter Steven B, Pathak Ram A, Lyon Timothy D, Hochwald Alex P, Dora Chandler D

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Florida Department of Urology, Jacksonville, FL.

Mayo Clinic Florida Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Urology. 2025 Feb;196:260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.058. Epub 2024 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.058
PMID:39622439
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if using spinal anesthesia (SA) for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) impacted the ability to perform same-day discharge (SDD) compared to a prostate volume-matched cohort undergoing HoLEP under general anesthesia (GA).

METHODS

From January 1, 2021 to March 28, 2024, 995 men underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon. Three hundred eleven were identified who had SA and a recorded preoperative prostate volume. Propensity score matching based on prostate volume was performed with the remaining cohort who received GA in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was rate of SDD.

RESULTS

When comparing SDD between the two groups, 84% of SA patients had SDD compared to 74% of GA patients (P-value .002). The operative time for SA was significantly shorter than GA (89 vs 101 minutes P-value <.001). The total operating room time (wheels-in to wheels-out) including anesthesia induction for SA was significantly shorter than GA (119 vs 128 minutes P-value .0003). There were no significant differences in early catheter reinsertion, emergency department visits, complications, or postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen measured at 3months.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing SA for HoLEP did not preclude SDD compared to a prostate volume-matched cohort who underwent HoLEP under GA. In fact, SDD were higher in the SA cohort without a corresponding increase in emergency department visits or catheter reinsertion.

摘要

目的

与接受全身麻醉(GA)进行钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)的前列腺体积匹配队列相比,确定使用脊髓麻醉(SA)进行HoLEP是否会影响当日出院(SDD)的能力。

方法

从2021年1月1日至2024年3月28日,995名男性由一名外科医生进行了HoLEP手术。确定了311名接受SA且术前前列腺体积有记录的患者。对其余接受GA的队列按1:1的比例进行基于前列腺体积的倾向评分匹配。主要结局是SDD率。

结果

比较两组的SDD情况时,84%的SA患者实现了SDD,而GA患者为74%(P值为0.002)。SA的手术时间明显短于GA(89分钟对101分钟,P值<0.001)。包括SA麻醉诱导在内的总手术室时间(推入到推出)明显短于GA(119分钟对128分钟,P值为0.0003)。在早期导尿管重新插入、急诊就诊、并发症或3个月时测量的术后血清前列腺特异性抗原方面没有显著差异。

结论

与在GA下进行HoLEP的前列腺体积匹配队列相比,使用SA进行HoLEP并不排除SDD。事实上,SA队列中的SDD率更高,且急诊就诊或导尿管重新插入没有相应增加。

相似文献

1
Same-day Discharge Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison With General Anesthesia.脊髓麻醉下钬激光前列腺剜除术后当日出院:与全身麻醉的倾向评分匹配比较
Urology. 2025 Feb;196:260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.11.058. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
2
Impact of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.钬激光前列腺剜除术对下尿路症状患者前列腺癌主动监测的影响
Prostate. 2025 Aug;85(11):989-999. doi: 10.1002/pros.24906. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
3
Comparative study of low-power versus high-power holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.低功率与高功率钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的对比研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 5;40(1):68. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04329-7.
4
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update.经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻所致下尿路症状的功能结局和并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析:更新
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
Does MOSES Technology Enhance the Efficiency and Outcomes of Standard Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.MOSES 技术是否能提高标准钬激光前列腺剜除术的效率和效果?系统评价和荟萃分析比较研究的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1362-1369. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Efficacy and safety of transurethral thulium laser enucleation versus robot-assisted prostatectomy for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经尿道铥激光前列腺剜除术与机器人辅助前列腺切除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2633-2646. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01715-7. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Assessment of the Patient's Perceived Fear and Anxiety During Ambulatory Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate: A Prospective, Real-Practice Study from a Single Center.门诊钬激光前列腺剜除术期间患者感知到的恐惧和焦虑评估:一项来自单一中心的前瞻性实际应用研究。
J Endourol. 2025 Jun;39(6):617-624. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0834. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
8
The safety and efficacy of five surgical treatments in prostate enucleation: a network meta-analysis.五种前列腺剜除术的安全性和有效性:网络荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01517-5.
9
Holmium Versus Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.钬激光与铥激光前列腺剜除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):545-554. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
To Hold or Continue Blood Thinners? A Retrospective Analysis on Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Who Either Held or Continued Antiplatelet/Anticoagulation Therapy.停用还是继续使用血液稀释剂?对停用或继续使用抗血小板/抗凝治疗的前列腺增生症患者进行钬激光剜除术的结果回顾性分析。
Urology. 2025 Jan;195:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.050. Epub 2024 Aug 28.