Maroufpour Sirwan, Aryana Kamran, Nasseri Shahrokh, Fazeli Zahra, Arabi Hossein, Momennezhad Mehdi
Medical Physics Group, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
EJNMMI Phys. 2024 Dec 3;11(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40658-024-00691-7.
Clinical trials have yielded promising results for Lutetium Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (Lu-PSMA) therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, the development of precise methods for internal dosimetry and accurate dose estimation has been considered ongoing research. This study aimed to calculate the absorbed dose to the critical organs and metastasis regions using GATE 9.0 Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) as a gold standard to compare the OLINDA 1.1 and IDAC 2.1 software.
This study investigated absorbed doses to different organs in 9 mCRPC patients during their first treatment cycle. Whole-body planar images were acquired at 1 ± 0.5, 4 ± 0.5, 24 ± 2, 48 ± 2, 72 ± 2, and 144 ± 2 h post-injection, with SPECT/CT images obtained at 24 ± 2 h. Absorbed doses were calculated for five organs and the entire metastasis regions using GATE, OLINDA, and IDAC platforms. The spherical method was used to determine and compare the absorbed doses in metastatic regions and undefined organs in OLINDA and IDAC Phantom.
The organ-absorbed dose calculations produced by GATE were consistent with those obtained from OLINDA and IDAC. The average percentage differences in absorbed dose for all organs between Monte Carlo calculations and the estimated from IDAC and OLINDA were -0.24 ± 2.14% and 5.16 ± 5.66%, respectively. There was a significant difference between GATE and both IDAC (17.55 ± 29.1%) and OLINDA (25.86 ± 18.04%) in determining absorbed doses to metastatic areas using the spherical model.
The absorbed dose of organs in the first treatment cycle remained below tolerable limits. However, cumulative absorbed doses should be considered for the administered activities in the next cycles of treatment. While Monte Carlo, IDAC, and OLINDA results were aligned for organ dose calculations, patient-specific dosimetry may be necessary due to anatomical and functional changes. Accurate dose estimation for undefined organs and metastatic regions using the spherical model is significantly influenced by tissue density, highlighting the value of CT imaging.
临床试验已在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的镥前列腺特异性膜抗原(Lu - PSMA)治疗中取得了有前景的结果。然而,精确的体内剂量测定方法和准确的剂量估计的开发仍在持续研究中。本研究旨在使用GATE 9.0蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)作为金标准来计算关键器官和转移区域的吸收剂量,以比较OLINDA 1.1和IDAC 2.1软件。
本研究调查了9例mCRPC患者在其首个治疗周期中不同器官的吸收剂量。在注射后1±0.5、4±0.5、24±2、48±2、72±2和144±2小时采集全身平面图像,并在24±2小时获得SPECT/CT图像。使用GATE平台、OLINDA平台和IDAC平台计算五个器官和整个转移区域的吸收剂量。采用球形方法确定并比较OLINDA和IDAC体模中转移区域和未定义器官的吸收剂量。
GATE计算得出的器官吸收剂量与OLINDA和IDAC得出的结果一致。蒙特卡罗计算与IDAC和OLINDA估计的所有器官吸收剂量的平均百分比差异分别为 - 0.24±2.14%和5.16±5.66%。使用球形模型确定转移区域的吸收剂量时,GATE与IDAC(17.55±29.1%)和OLINDA(25.86±18.04%)之间存在显著差异。
首个治疗周期中器官的吸收剂量仍低于可耐受限度。然而,在后续治疗周期中给药活度时应考虑累积吸收剂量。虽然蒙特卡罗、IDAC和OLINDA在器官剂量计算结果上一致,但由于解剖和功能变化,可能需要进行患者特异性剂量测定。使用球形模型对未定义器官和转移区域进行准确的剂量估计受组织密度影响较大,凸显了CT成像的价值。