Automatic B-lines: a tool for minimizing time to diuretic administration in pulmonary edema patients in the emergency department of a developing country.

BACKGROUND

Effective management of pulmonary edema in the emergency department (ED) is crucial given its significant global impact on health. This study aimed to investigate the hypothesis: "Does the utilization of Automatic B-lines via ultrasonography in patients with pulmonary edema facilitate faster diuretic administration in a developing country?"

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary academic center in Thailand. Patients with pulmonary edema admitted to the ED between January 2023 and June 2024 were enrolled. Ultrasound documentation and electronic ED medical records were compared to assess the time of diuretic administration between patients who had lung ultrasounds utilizing automatic B-lines and those who had manual B-lines counted by physician eye inspection. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the relationship between the use of automatic B-lines and early diuretic administration.

RESULTS

The study included 134 patients with pulmonary edema. The time to diuretic administration was significantly shorter in the automatic B-lines group (median time [Q1-Q3], 55 min; range, 35-110 min) compared to the non-automatic B-lines group (median time, 100 min; range, 75-145 min). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, early diuretic administration within 60 min of triage was significantly more likely in the automatic B-lines group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.45) than in the non-automatic B-lines group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a developing country, patients with pulmonary edema who had lung ultrasound evaluation with automated B lines experienced a fastest diuresis compared to those who utilized ultrasonography without automatic B lines. Implementing automatic B-lines as an early screening protocol could enhance clinical practice in the ED.