Shen Jesse, Louie Philip, Fujii Takeshi, Drolet Caroline E, Bansal Aiyush, Nemani Venu, Leveque Jean-Christophe, Sethi Rajiv
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, CHUM, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroscience and Spine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 3;25(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08126-1.
The study aimed to assess the link between preoperative psychological distress and postoperative decisional regret in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery patients. We hypothesized that greater pre-surgery distress would correlate with higher post-surgery regret. This evaluation was based on a retrospective case series from an institution with standardized surgical guidelines for ASD.
This IRB-approved retrospective study analyzed our institution's ASD database from 2014 to 2020. Eligible patients had a minimum two-year post-op follow-up and preoperative psychological distress assessment. Patients were grouped based on psychological distress levels: green, yellow, and yellow minus. Regret post-surgery was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale and SRS-22 Question 22. Logistic regression evaluated the impact of distress levels on regret, controlling for age and sex.
Out of 167 eligible patients, 112 responded and were analyzed. No significant demographic differences were observed between responders and non-responders. Using the Decision Regret Scale, 41% expressed no regret, while 63% expressed no regret with the SRS-22 questionnaire's Single-Item scale. Only the yellow minus group showed significant regret difference based on osteotomy, with non-recipients more likely to express regret.
This study found no significant link between psychological distress and post-operative regret in adult spinal deformity surgery after a minimum 2-year follow-up. Although nearly 60% exhibited some post-surgery regret, predicting regret based on psychological burden or demographics remains challenging. Further research is essential to identify factors contributing to post-operative regret in spinal deformity surgery patients.
本研究旨在评估成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术患者术前心理困扰与术后决策后悔之间的联系。我们假设术前困扰程度越高,术后后悔程度越高。该评估基于一家具有ASD标准化手术指南机构的回顾性病例系列。
这项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究分析了我们机构2014年至2020年的ASD数据库。符合条件的患者术后至少有两年随访且有术前心理困扰评估。患者根据心理困扰水平分组:绿色、黄色和黄色减号组。使用决策后悔量表和SRS - 22问卷的第22题评估术后后悔情况。逻辑回归评估困扰水平对后悔的影响,并控制年龄和性别因素。
167名符合条件的患者中,112名有回应并被分析。回应者和未回应者之间未观察到显著的人口统计学差异。使用决策后悔量表,41%的患者表示无悔,而使用SRS - 22问卷单项量表时,63%的患者表示无悔。只有黄色减号组在截骨术方面显示出显著的后悔差异,未接受截骨术的患者更有可能表达后悔。
本研究发现,在至少两年的随访后,成人脊柱畸形手术中心理困扰与术后后悔之间没有显著联系。尽管近60%的患者表现出一定程度的术后后悔,但基于心理负担或人口统计学因素来预测后悔仍然具有挑战性。进一步的研究对于确定导致脊柱畸形手术患者术后后悔的因素至关重要。