Hnath Joseph G P, McWilliams J Michael, Chernew Michael E
Joseph G. P. Hnath (
J. Michael McWilliams, Harvard University and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Dec;43(12):1647-1654. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00577.
This study examined the evolving landscape of insurer competition in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program from both national and local perspectives. Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services revealed that the MA market has become more concentrated. National carriers expanded their national market share significantly from 2012 to 2023, whereas the collective market share of regional carriers without affiliation to Blue Cross and Blue Shield organizations declined because of acquisitions. For example, the combined national market share of national carriers increased from 46 percent in 2012 to 66 percent in 2023, while the combined national market share of non-Blue regional carriers decreased from 25 percent to 6 percent. Conversely, concentration in local markets has declined but remains highly concentrated, and evidence suggests that further declines may be unlikely. Specifically, declines in local market concentration have been limited to markets with low MA penetration. Once MA penetration exceeds 20 percent, further MA growth is not associated with further drops in concentration, on average. Thus, policy makers should be aware that MA program reforms that assume MA markets are competitive are unlikely to achieve program goals without ensuring the competitiveness of those markets.
本研究从国家和地方两个层面考察了医疗保险优势(MA)计划中保险公司竞争格局的演变。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的数据显示,MA市场的集中度有所提高。2012年至2023年期间,全国性保险公司大幅扩大了其全国市场份额,而未隶属于蓝十字蓝盾组织的区域性保险公司的总体市场份额因收购而下降。例如,全国性保险公司的全国市场份额合计从2012年的46%增至2023年的66%,而非蓝十字蓝盾区域性保险公司的全国市场份额合计则从25%降至6%。相反,地方市场的集中度虽有所下降,但仍处于高度集中状态,且有证据表明进一步下降的可能性不大。具体而言,地方市场集中度的下降仅限于MA渗透率较低的市场。一旦MA渗透率超过20%,平均而言,MA的进一步增长与集中度的进一步下降并无关联。因此,政策制定者应意识到,在未确保MA市场竞争力的情况下,假定MA市场具有竞争性的MA计划改革不太可能实现计划目标。