• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Soil Fertility and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land Based on the Geodetector].

作者信息

Wang Xiang-Yu, Zhang Xue-Xia, Hu Yun-Zhe, Mu Wei, Fang Hua-Jun

机构信息

School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

The Zhongke-Ji'an Institute for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Ji'an 343100, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Dec 8;45(12):7378-7389. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202311054.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202311054
PMID:39628201
Abstract

Taihe County in Jiangxi Province was chosen as the study area to analyze the soil fertility condition and affecting elements of cultivation at the county level. Classical statistics, geostatistics, and geodetector were utilized to examine soil fertility quality and investigate its primary affecting aspects based on experimental data from 206 cultivated soil samples. The results showed that: ① Taihe County had an average soil pH of 4.87, indicating slightly acidic soil. A total of 97.39% of the sample sites had CEC contents of four and five levels, and the EC content levels were concentrated in the second level, 63.48% of the SOC contents were in the medium levels, 73.92% of the TN contents were higher than 1.5 g·kg, 72.17% of the TP contents were lower than 0.6 g·kg, and the AP contents were in the high level, greater than 20 mg·kg, accounting for 86.09% of the sample sites. The soil fertility in the research area was poor, and the soil was of light and medium salinization, lacking organic matter and total phosphorus. The lump gold effect values of pH, EC, AP, SOC, TN, and TP were 0.17, 0.21, 0.18, 0.52, 0.45, and 0.59, respectively. The spatial correlation between soil pH, EC, and AP was strong, while soil SOC, TN, and TP had a moderate degree of spatial correlation. The spatial variation of soil fertility in Taihe County was influenced by both structural factors (topography, climate, and soil type) and random factors (fertilization, cultivation methods, soil pollution, etc.). ② The results of the weight coefficients of farmland soil fertility were TN (0.210), SOC (0.195), EC (0.190), CEC (0.171), TP (0.170), AP (0.117), and pH (-0.053). Soil TN, SOC, and EC were key indicators that affected farmland soil fertility in the study area. The comprehensive score grading of soil fertility quality showed that most of the soil fertility quality in the study area was level three, and the soil fertility in Shangmo Township was relatively fertile. The soil fertility quality level was Level 2 and Level 3. The soil fertility in Yanxi Town and Wanhe Town was relatively poor, and the soil fertility quality level was Level 3 and Level 4. ③ , , , , and were the main driving factors affecting farmland soil fertility. The explanatory power of each factor interaction was greater than that of single factor interactions, manifested in two types: double factor enhancement and nonlinear synergistic effect. The soil fertility of farmland was the result of the joint action of multiple influencing factors. The results of the research revealed the status quo and spatial distribution characteristics of soil fertility in the study area, investigated the factors influencing soil fertility in farmland, and analyzed the foundation for improving the intrinsic quality and output capacity of cultivable land and the ecological environment of agriculture.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Soil Fertility and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land Based on the Geodetector].
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Dec 8;45(12):7378-7389. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202311054.
2
[Influencing Factors Analysis and Spatial Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Content in the Hilly Areas of the Loess Plateau].黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土壤有机碳含量影响因素分析及空间估算
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Apr 8;46(4):2301-2312. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202403260.
3
[Differences in Soil Fertility and Bacterial Community Structure Between Carbon Inputs such as Biochar and Organic Fertilizer and Their Relationship].[生物炭和有机肥等碳输入之间的土壤肥力和细菌群落结构差异及其关系]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jul 8;45(7):4218-4227. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202307062.
4
Spatial distribution of soil nutrients and evaluation of cultivated land in Xuwen county.徐闻县土壤养分的空间分布及耕地评价。
PeerJ. 2022 Jun 30;10:e13239. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13239. eCollection 2022.
5
[Effects of Biochar on Soil Organic Carbon of Eroded Cultivated Layer of Slope Farmland in Purple Hilly Area].[生物炭对紫色丘陵区坡耕地侵蚀耕层土壤有机碳的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Apr 8;43(4):2209-2218. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202107160.
6
[Spatial Differentiation Characteristics and Driving Factors of Soil Organic Carbon in Various Landscape Complexes].[不同景观复合体中土壤有机碳的空间分异特征及驱动因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Mar 8;46(3):1679-1689. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202403253.
7
[Soil fertility characteristics under different land use patterns in depressions between karst hills].[喀斯特丘陵间洼地不同土地利用模式下的土壤肥力特征]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Jun;25(6):1561-8.
8
[Spatial Heterogeneity and Key Influencing Factors of Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Total Nitrogen, and Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio in main plantations of cv. Merrillii].[尾巨桉主要人工林土壤有机碳、全氮及碳氮比的空间异质性与关键影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Sep 8;45(9):5441-5450. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202310097.
9
Effects of vegetation and terrain changes on spatial heterogeneity of soil C-N-P in the coastal zone protected forests at northern China.植被和地形变化对中国北方沿海保护林土壤碳氮磷空间异质性的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 1;317:115472. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115472. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
10
[Spatial Differentiation Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Influencing Factors in Cultivated Land in Major Grain-producing Areas: A Case Study of Hebei Province].
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Oct 8;45(10):6002-6011. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202309140.