Urban Matthias
Dynamique Du Langage, Centre Nacional de la Recherche Scientifique, Lyon, France.
Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jan 20;4:213. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18421.1. eCollection 2024.
While it has almost become a truism of comparative linguistics that linguistic diversity is unevently distributed across the globe, the reasons are poorly understood up to the present day. Linguists are thus in the embarassing situation that they do not understand significant regularities in the way the objects of their study -languages- pattern. In this essay, I explore three interrelated strands of thought to create a perspective on the question that is different from those explored so far: first, I suggest that instead of looking at present-day levels of diversity statically, we should take an approach that looks into how these distributions were generated. Related to this point and in contradistinction to extant work, second, I advocate an inductive approach that departs from qualitative case studies that inform theory-building. Third, I ponder that, in contrast to the traditional focus of historical linguistics on language diversification and expansion, understanding how the ranges of languages are reduced might be the key missing piece of evidence in a global theory of language diversity and its genesis. This new perspective is also able to address the striking correlation between linguistic and biological diversity that suggest that the processes that created and maintain both are, on some level, qualitatively similar.
虽然语言多样性在全球分布不均这一点几乎已成为比较语言学的一个不言而喻的事实,但直到如今,其原因仍鲜为人知。因此,语言学家们陷入了尴尬的境地,即他们并不理解他们所研究的对象——语言——的模式中存在的显著规律。在本文中,我探讨了三条相互关联的思路,以创建一个与迄今所探讨的不同的关于这个问题的视角:第一,我建议与其静态地看待当今的多样性水平,我们应该采取一种探究这些分布是如何形成的方法。与这一点相关且与现有研究相反的是,第二,我提倡一种归纳法,它从为理论构建提供信息的定性案例研究出发。第三,我思考,与历史语言学传统上对语言多样化和扩张的关注不同,理解语言范围是如何缩小的,可能是全球语言多样性及其起源理论中缺失的关键证据。这个新视角也能够解释语言多样性与生物多样性之间惊人的相关性,这表明创造和维持两者的过程在某种程度上在质上是相似的。