Jakubowski Szczepan, Holko Przemysław, Nowak Rafał, Warmuth Marisa, Dooms Marc, Salminen Outi, Cortial Lucas, Selke Gisbert W, Georgi Christina, Magnússon Einar, Crisafulli Salvatore, Strijbosch Fons, Mueller Tanja, Grieve Eleanor, Danés Immaculada, Kawalec Paweł
Department of Health Promotion and e-Health, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Department of Nutrition and Drug Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 19;15:1498386. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1498386. eCollection 2024.
The aim of the study was to assess the reimbursement policy for orphan drugs (ODs) in selected European countries in relation to the availability and impact of clinical evidence, health technology assessment (HTA) procedures and reimbursement decision-making.
A list of authorized ODs was extracted from a web-based registry of the European Medicines Agency, including information on active substance, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification code, and therapeutic area. A country-based questionnaire survey was conducted between September 2022 and September 2023 among selected experts from 12 European countries. A descriptive and statistical analysis was performed to identify correlations between country characteristic, HTA procedures, drug indication and positive recommendations or reimbursement decisions for ODs.
Safety assessment for ODs was mandatory in 10 countries, while it was optional in one country (Italy) and not required in one country (Iceland). Efficacy assessment for ODs was mandatory in 11 countries and not required in one country (Iceland). The impact of safety and efficacy assessment on reimbursement decisions was rated as high in 10 countries and as low in one country (Germany). Dedicated OD legislation and policies were reported in seven countries. In two countries (Belgium, Iceland), the HTA was not mandatory, and in one country (Germany), it only had an informative function. A positive recommendation (from an HTA agency or advisory body) guaranteed reimbursement in four countries, while a negative recommendation excluded reimbursement only in one country (Iceland). The proportion of reimbursed ODs ranged from 23.5% in Iceland to 86% in Germany ( < 0.001). ODs with ATC code L represented the largest group of medicines (n = 49). They were also very frequently reimbursed ODs in the countries studied, with a mean of 61.8% ( < 0.001).
European countries differ in terms of the impact of clinical issues and additional clinical aspects on the reimbursement policy for ODs. Reimbursement decisions were affected by OD-specific legislation, policies, and EMA authorization status. HTA dossiers and procedures significantly influenced reimbursement decisions, although some ODs were reimbursed regardless of the positive or negative recommendations. ATC codes were significantly correlated with reimbursement status and positive recommendation.
本研究旨在评估部分欧洲国家针对罕见病药物(ODs)的报销政策,涉及临床证据的可及性与影响、卫生技术评估(HTA)程序以及报销决策。
从欧洲药品管理局的基于网络的登记册中提取授权ODs清单,包括活性物质、解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类代码和治疗领域的信息。2022年9月至2023年9月期间,对来自12个欧洲国家的选定专家进行了基于国家的问卷调查。进行了描述性和统计分析,以确定国家特征、HTA程序、药物适应症与ODs的阳性推荐或报销决策之间的相关性。
10个国家对ODs的安全性评估是强制性的,而在一个国家(意大利)是可选的,在一个国家(冰岛)则不需要。11个国家对ODs的疗效评估是强制性的,在一个国家(冰岛)则不需要。10个国家将安全性和疗效评估对报销决策的影响评为高,在一个国家(德国)评为低。7个国家报告了专门的OD立法和政策。在两个国家(比利时、冰岛),HTA不是强制性的,在一个国家(德国),它仅具有信息功能。来自HTA机构或咨询机构的阳性推荐在4个国家保证报销,而阴性推荐仅在一个国家(冰岛)排除报销。报销的ODs比例从冰岛的23.5%到德国的86%不等(<0.001)。ATC代码为L的ODs代表最大的药品组(n = 49)。它们也是所研究国家中报销频率非常高的ODs,平均为61.8%(<0.001)。
欧洲国家在临床问题和其他临床方面对ODs报销政策的影响方面存在差异。报销决策受ODs特定的立法、政策和欧洲药品管理局授权状态的影响。HTA档案和程序对报销决策有显著影响,尽管一些ODs无论阳性或阴性推荐都能报销。ATC代码与报销状态和阳性推荐显著相关。