• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射肿瘤学中患者安全指标的目标——作为PaSaGeRO研究一部分的系统文献综述结果

Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study.

作者信息

Baehr Andrea, Grohmann Maximilian, Christalle Eva, Schwenzer Felicitas, Scholl Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2025 Feb;203:110657. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657
PMID:39631503
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) allow the evaluation of safety levels in healthcare settings. Despite their use in various medical fields, a specific and comprehensive PSI catalogue for radiation oncology (RO) is lacking. The Patient Safety in German Radiation Oncology (PaSaGeRO) study aims for the development of a specific PSI catalogue in radiation oncology.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study is to identify, formulate, and categorize PSIs specific to RO to bridge existing gaps in comprehensive patient safety evaluation.

METHODS

An electronic search in PubMed included studies from 1989 onwards, in English or German, focusing on safety and quality indicators in RO, patient safety measures, or risk analyses. Exclusions were non-transferable, country-specific measures, techniques exclusive to specific departments, and legally mandated procedures. Additional sources were identified through reference tracking and professional society websites. Two experts independently extracted PSIs from the included references.

RESULTS

Out of 157 included publications and nine secondary sources, we identified and formulated 145 PSIs. These were categorized into patient-specific processes (82, 56%), quality and risk management (42, 28%), human resources (15, 10%), and institutional culture (13, 9%).

CONCLUSION

The hereby developed PSIs provides a base for professionals to systematically evaluate and improve safety practices, addressing previously unmet needs in this field. By offering clear guidance on safety assessment, the catalogue has the potential to drive significant improvements in patient care and safety outcomes in RO. Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00034690).

摘要

背景

患者安全指标(PSIs)可用于评估医疗环境中的安全水平。尽管其已在多个医学领域得到应用,但放射肿瘤学(RO)领域仍缺乏具体且全面的PSIs目录。德国放射肿瘤学患者安全(PaSaGeRO)研究旨在开发放射肿瘤学领域特定的PSIs目录。

目的

作为PaSaGeRO研究的一部分,本系统文献综述的主要目的是识别、制定和分类RO领域特有的PSIs,以填补全面患者安全评估中现有的空白。

方法

在PubMed上进行电子检索,纳入1989年起发表的英文或德文研究,重点关注RO领域的安全和质量指标、患者安全措施或风险分析。排除不可转移的、特定国家的措施、特定科室独有的技术以及法定程序。通过参考文献追踪和专业协会网站确定其他来源。两名专家独立从纳入的参考文献中提取PSIs。

结果

在157篇纳入出版物和9个二级来源中,我们识别并制定了145个PSIs。这些指标分为患者特定流程(82个,占56%)、质量与风险管理(42个,占28%)、人力资源(15个,占10%)和机构文化(13个,占9%)。

结论

此处制定的PSIs为专业人员系统评估和改进安全实践提供了基础,满足了该领域此前未满足的需求。通过在安全评估方面提供明确指导,该目录有可能推动RO领域患者护理和安全结果的显著改善。由德国癌症援助组织资助。在德国临床试验注册中心注册(DRKS00034690)。

相似文献

1
Aiming for patient safety indicators in radiation oncology - Results from a systematic literature review as part of the PaSaGeRO study.放射肿瘤学中患者安全指标的目标——作为PaSaGeRO研究一部分的系统文献综述结果
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Feb;203:110657. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110657. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
9
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
10
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.

引用本文的文献

1
Current practices in peer review in German radiation oncology: a nationwide survey.德国放射肿瘤学同行评审的当前实践:一项全国性调查。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s00066-025-02444-6.