McKernan Gina, Mesoros Matt, Dicianno Brad E
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 May;106(5):682-687. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.11.013. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
To determine which statistical techniques enhance our ability to predict ambulation and transfer ability in people with spina bifida (SB).
Retrospective cohort study.
Thirty-five US outpatient SB clinic sites.
Individuals (n=4589) with SB aged 5-73 years (median age=13.59y).
Not applicable.
Ambulation ability, which consisted of the following categories: community ambulators, household ambulators, therapeutic ambulators, and nonambulators.
Wheelchair transfer ability, as defined by the ability to transfer in and out of a wheelchair unassisted.
A recurrent neural network (RNN) using a multilayer perceptron discarded 76 cases during case processing, resulting in 4513 that were run through the RNN. The predictions in the resulting testing dataset were 83.22% accurate. Recall was 93.21% for community ambulators, 10.00% for household ambulators, 23.96% for therapeutic ambulators, and 76.70% for nonambulators. Precision was 85.34% for community ambulators, 16.05% for household ambulators, 16.67% for therapeutic ambulators, and 93.47% for nonambulators. Total predictions included 68.39% for community ambulators, 2.25% for household ambulators, 3.83% for therapeutic ambulators, and 25.53% for nonambulators. Correspondingly, the model accurately classified 70% of wheelchair transfers while correctly identifying 97.3% of those able to transfer unassisted.
RNN models hold promise for the prediction of functional outcomes such as ambulation and transfer ability in people with SB, particularly for community ambulators and nonambulators. Compared with the previous work using traditional logistic regression approaches which misclassified 16% of cases, the RNN resulted in greater prediction accuracy with fewer than 7% of cases misclassified.
确定哪些统计技术能增强我们预测脊柱裂(SB)患者行走和转移能力的能力。
回顾性队列研究。
美国35个门诊SB诊所。
4589名年龄在5 - 73岁(中位年龄 = 13.59岁)的SB患者。
不适用。
行走能力,包括以下类别:社区行走者、家庭行走者、治疗性行走者和非行走者。
轮椅转移能力,定义为在无协助情况下进出轮椅的能力。
使用多层感知器的循环神经网络(RNN)在病例处理过程中剔除了76例,最终有4513例通过RNN进行分析。在生成的测试数据集中,预测准确率为83.22%。社区行走者的召回率为93.21%,家庭行走者为10.00%,治疗性行走者为23.96%,非行走者为76.70%。社区行走者的精确率为85.34%,家庭行走者为16.05%,治疗性行走者为16.67%,非行走者为93.47%。总体预测中,社区行走者占68.39%;家庭行走者占2.25%;治疗性行走者占3.83%;非行走者占25.53%。相应地,该模型准确分类了70%的轮椅转移情况,同时正确识别了97.3%能够独立转移的患者。
RNN模型有望用于预测SB患者的功能结局,如行走和转移能力,特别是对于社区行走者和非行走者。与之前使用传统逻辑回归方法且错误分类16%病例的研究相比,RNN的预测准确率更高,错误分类的病例少于7%。