Bidelman Gavin M, York Ashleigh, Pearson Claire
Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Cognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; Univeristy of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Neuroscience. 2025 Jan 26;565:182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.079. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
This study assessed the neural mechanisms and relative saliency of categorization for speech sounds and comparable graphemes (i.e., visual letters) of the same phonetic label. Given that linguistic experience shapes categorical processing, and letter-speech sound matching plays a crucial role during early reading acquisition, we hypothesized sound phoneme and visual grapheme tokens representing the same linguistic identity might recruit common neural substrates, despite originating from different sensory modalities. Behavioral and neuroelectric brain responses (ERPs) were acquired as participants categorized stimuli from sound (phoneme) and homologous letter (grapheme) continua each spanning a /da/-/ga/ gradient. Behaviorally, listeners were faster and showed stronger categorization of phoneme compared to graphemes. At the neural level, multidimensional scaling of the EEG revealed responses self-organized in a categorial fashion such that tokens clustered within their respective modality beginning ∼150-250 ms after stimulus onset. Source-resolved ERPs further revealed modality-specific and overlapping brain regions supporting phonetic categorization. Left inferior frontal gyrus and auditory cortex showed stronger responses for sound category members compared to phonetically ambiguous tokens, whereas early visual cortices paralleled this categorical organization for graphemes. Auditory and visual categorization also recruited common visual association areas in extrastriate cortex but in opposite hemispheres (auditory = left; visual = right). Our findings reveal both auditory and visual sensory cortex supports categorical organization for phonetic labels within their respective modalities. However, a partial overlap in phoneme and grapheme processing among occipital brain areas implies the presence of an isomorphic, domain-general mapping for phonetic categories in dorsal visual system.
本研究评估了具有相同语音标签的语音和可比字素(即视觉字母)分类的神经机制及相对显著性。鉴于语言经验塑造了范畴加工,且字母 - 语音匹配在早期阅读习得过程中起着关键作用,我们推测,尽管声音音素和视觉字素符号源自不同的感觉模态,但代表相同语言身份的它们可能会征募共同的神经基质。当参与者对来自声音(音素)和同源字母(字素)连续体的刺激进行分类时,获取了行为和神经电脑反应(ERP),每个连续体都跨越一个 /da/-/ga/ 梯度。在行为层面,与字素相比,听众对音素的分类更快且表现更强。在神经层面,脑电图的多维标度揭示了反应以范畴方式自组织,使得符号在刺激开始后约150 - 250毫秒内在各自的模态内聚类。源解析ERP进一步揭示了支持语音分类的模态特异性和重叠的脑区。与语音模糊的符号相比,左下额回和听觉皮层对声音类别成员表现出更强的反应,而早期视觉皮层对字素呈现出类似的范畴组织。听觉和视觉分类还在纹外皮层征募了共同的视觉联合区,但在相反的半球(听觉 = 左;视觉 = 右)。我们的研究结果表明,听觉和视觉感觉皮层都支持各自模态内语音标签的范畴组织。然而,枕叶脑区中音素和字素加工的部分重叠意味着在背侧视觉系统中存在语音类别的同构、领域通用映射。