Visscher Maira, Schuls-Fouchier Manon, Berends Annika M A, Muller Kobold Anneke C, Punt Nieko C, Touw Daan J
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;91(4):1233-1240. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16342. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
A 42-year-old male developed chronic primary hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy. Conventional therapy led to recurrent nephrolithiasis and therefore rhPTH(1-84) (parathyroid hormone [PTH]) treatment was considered. According to the dosing guideline for PTH, calcium plasma levels are adequately controlled with once-daily administration. However, the effect on urinary calcium excretion is only transient and hence does not lower the risk of nephrolithiasis. This raises the question of whether multiple-daily or continuous administration of PTH is more effective in lowering urinary calcium excretion. We aimed to construct a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model to answer this question.
A single patient was treated with intermittent PTH followed by off-label continuous infusion of PTH. PTH was measured in plasma, calcium and phosphate in plasma and urine. A one-compartment PKPD model for PTH was developed with Edsim++. The effect of PTH was described by the relative clearance of calcium and phosphate.
The PKPD model for PTH showed visually a marked effect on phosphate clearance, but less on calcium clearance. During the study, the patient also received medication that influenced calcium homeostasis but to a lesser extent phosphate homeostasis. Therefore, phosphate was chosen as the effect parameter, resulting in an EC50 of 6.3 pmol/L PTH.
The PKPD model for PTH was completed with the unique data of a single patient who received PTH according to various dosing regimens, including continuous infusion. Continuous administration of PTH is favoured because it permanently increases the phosphate clearance and therefore needs to be further investigated.
一名42岁男性在全甲状腺切除术后发生慢性原发性甲状旁腺功能减退。传统治疗导致复发性肾结石,因此考虑使用重组人甲状旁腺激素(1-84)[rhPTH(1-84),甲状旁腺激素(PTH)]进行治疗。根据PTH给药指南,每日一次给药可充分控制血浆钙水平。然而,其对尿钙排泄的影响只是短暂的,因此并不能降低肾结石的风险。这就提出了一个问题,即每日多次给药或持续给药的PTH在降低尿钙排泄方面是否更有效。我们旨在构建一个药代动力学-药效学(PKPD)模型来回答这个问题。
一名患者先接受间歇性PTH治疗,随后接受未按标签说明的PTH持续输注。检测血浆中的PTH、血浆和尿液中的钙及磷酸盐水平。使用Edsim++软件建立了一个PTH的单室PKPD模型。PTH的作用通过钙和磷酸盐的相对清除率来描述。
PTH的PKPD模型直观显示对磷酸盐清除率有显著影响,但对钙清除率的影响较小。在研究期间,患者还接受了影响钙稳态但对磷酸盐稳态影响较小的药物治疗。因此,选择磷酸盐作为效应参数,得出PTH的半数有效浓度(EC50)为6.3 pmol/L。
通过一名按照包括持续输注在内的各种给药方案接受PTH治疗的患者的独特数据,完成了PTH的PKPD模型。持续给予PTH更受青睐,因为它能持续增加磷酸盐清除率,因此需要进一步研究。