Hopkins Arielle J, Chau Terence, Pullinger Benjamin, Kim Sungwook, Delic Justin J, Igneri Lauren A, Kim Soyoung
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Mar;58(3):420-426. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03060-4. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
The use of weight-based unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions is the standard of care in hospital management of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Initial dosing strategies for UFH in older adults and higher body weight patients remain uncertain given differences in pharmacokinetics and concerns for over-anticoagulation. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, pre-post study involving older adults aged ≥ 65 years and patients weighing ≥ 100 kg with suspected or confirmed VTE to determine if the use of adjusted body weight (AdjBW)-based UFH regimens improves time to therapeutic anti-Xa levels compared to total body weight (TBW)-based regimens Patients received weight-based UFH infusions, dosed according to either TBW or AdjBW, to target a therapeutic anti-Xa level. Each cohort consisted of 40 patients, stratified by whether they met age or weight criteria to ensure equal representation of elderly and higher body weight patients between cohorts. The median time to therapeutic anti-Xa levels was shorter in the AdjBW group compared to the TBW group (13.6 h versus 20.9 h; point estimate 5.3 h (95% CI 0.2 to 9.9)). This finding was driven by those aged ≥ 65 years and those who received a bolus dose at the start of the infusion. Among older adults and higher weight adults with suspected or confirmed VTE, the use of AdjBW to guide heparin infusion initiation was associated with shorter time to therapeutic anti-Xa levels. This finding driven by the older adult sample and the subgroup analyses did not find a statistically significant difference in time to therapeutic anti-Xa levels in higher body weight patients aged less than 65 years.
基于体重的普通肝素(UFH)输注的使用是静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)医院管理中的护理标准。鉴于药代动力学的差异以及对过度抗凝的担忧,老年人和高体重患者中UFH的初始给药策略仍不确定。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性、前后对照研究,纳入年龄≥65岁的老年人和体重≥100kg的疑似或确诊VTE患者,以确定与基于总体重(TBW)的方案相比,使用基于调整体重(AdjBW)的UFH方案是否能缩短达到治疗性抗Xa水平的时间。患者接受基于体重的UFH输注,根据TBW或AdjBW给药,以达到治疗性抗Xa水平。每个队列由40名患者组成,根据是否符合年龄或体重标准进行分层,以确保各队列中老年人和高体重患者的比例相等。与TBW组相比,AdjBW组达到治疗性抗Xa水平的中位时间更短(13.6小时对20.9小时;点估计值为5.3小时(95%CI 0.2至9.9))。这一发现是由年龄≥65岁的患者以及在输注开始时接受推注剂量的患者推动的。在疑似或确诊VTE的老年人和高体重成年人中,使用AdjBW指导肝素输注起始与达到治疗性抗Xa水平的时间更短相关。这一发现是由老年样本推动的,亚组分析未发现年龄小于65岁的高体重患者达到治疗性抗Xa水平的时间存在统计学显著差异。