Lu Hongwei, Zhang Shuangmei, Shao Chenjun, Chen Pengfei, Ma Minting, Hao Yuhua
Hongwei Lu Department of Ophthalmology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province 050000, P.R. China.
Shuangmei Zhang Department of Ophthalmology, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province 050000, P.R. China.
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2689-2694. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.10607.
To compare the efficacy of 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA) eye drops (II) and 3% Diquafosol ophthalmic solution (DQS) in the treatment of dry eye (DE) after cataract surgery (CS).
Clinical data of 123 patients with DE after CS treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from June 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the treatment: Conventional group (tobramycin & dexamethasone eye drops combined with pranoprofen eye drops, n=41), DQS group (3% DQS based on the conventional treatment, n=42), and CsA group (0.05% CsA eye drops(II) based on the conventional treatment, n=40). The therapeutic effects; Schirmer I test (SIt), tear film breakup time (TBUT), levels of serum inflammatory factors, and tear cytokine levels before and after treatment were compared between the groups.
Chief complaint score, conjunctival congestion score, corneal fluorescein staining score, and ocular surface disease index score of the DQS group and the CsA groups were significantly lower than those of the conventional group (<0.05). After treatment, the improvement in SIt, TBUT, serum inflammatory factors, and tear cytokine levels in the DQS group and the CsA group was significantly better than that in the conventional group (<0.05). However, these indexes were comparable in the DQS and the CsA group (>0.05).
Compared to the conventional treatment alone, the addition of 3% DQS or 0.05% CsA eye drops (II) to the conventional treatment both are effective and might more effectively alleviate DE in patients undergoing CS.
比较0.05%环孢素A(CsA)滴眼液(II)和3%地夸磷索滴眼液(DQS)治疗白内障手术后干眼症(DE)的疗效。
回顾性分析2022年6月至2023年8月在河北医科大学第四医院接受治疗的123例白内障手术后干眼症患者的临床资料。根据治疗方法将患者分为三组:常规组(妥布霉素和地塞米松滴眼液联合普拉洛芬滴眼液,n = 41)、DQS组(在常规治疗基础上加用3% DQS,n = 42)和CsA组(在常规治疗基础上加用0.05% CsA滴眼液(II),n = 40)。比较各组治疗前后的治疗效果、泪液分泌试验(SIt)、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、血清炎症因子水平和泪液细胞因子水平。
DQS组和CsA组的主要症状评分、结膜充血评分、角膜荧光素染色评分和眼表疾病指数评分均显著低于常规组(<0.05)。治疗后,DQS组和CsA组的SIt、TBUT、血清炎症因子和泪液细胞因子水平的改善明显优于常规组(<0.05)。然而,这些指标在DQS组和CsA组中相当(>0.05)。
与单纯常规治疗相比,在常规治疗基础上加用3% DQS或0.05% CsA滴眼液(II)均有效,且可能更有效地缓解白内障手术患者的干眼症。