• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人当前医疗决策参与自我效能与生前预嘱参与之间的关联:一项全国性纵向队列研究的基线结果

Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.

作者信息

Lin Cheng-Pei, Liao Jung-Yu, Huang Chi-Hsien, Cheng Shao-Yi, Tseng Wei-Zhe, Mori Masanori, Chang Hsien-Cheng, Li Chia-Ming, Sun Wen-Jung, Wu Chien-Yi, Chiou Hung-Yi, Yu Sang-Ju, Hsiung Chao A, Chen Ping-Jen

机构信息

Institute of Community Health Care, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Cicely Saunders Institute, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;28(1):50-58. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0106. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0106
PMID:39636682
Abstract

Misconceptions of and cultural differences in aging influence older adults' medical decision-making self-efficacy and engagement in advance care planning (ACP). This study aims to investigate the association between current medical decision-making participation self-efficacy and ACP engagement among older individuals receiving home-based medical care (HBMC) in Taiwan. Baseline data analysis of a nationwide cohort study. Patients aged ≥50 years who had been consistently receiving HBMC for > two months between November 2019 and December 2022 were recruited. Study recruitment took place at six hospitals and 12 community home care institutions. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, decision-making participation self-efficacy, and ACP engagement. Descriptive, stratified, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. In total, 408 HBMC recipients were enrolled (average age: 80.4 years; 55% women). The respondents reported moderate decision-making participation self-efficacy but low ACP engagement. In light of the transtheoretical model of behavior change, participants with moderate or high self-efficacy had a significantly higher chance of reaching the "contemplation stage" for ACP decisions (odds ratio or OR 4.06-27.13). Participants were more likely to reach the "preparation and action stages" for ACP decisions only when they had high self-efficacy (OR 2.76-14.73). Although participants with better current medical decision-making self-efficacy were more likely to contemplate ACP, many did not take action beyond appointing a medical surrogate(s). Strategies to enhance decisional self-efficacy, thereby increasing timely ACP discussions among older adults in home settings in Chinese culture, are warranted. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT04250103 which has been registered on 31st January 2020.

摘要

对衰老的误解及文化差异会影响老年人的医疗决策自我效能感以及他们参与预先护理计划(ACP)的程度。本研究旨在调查台湾接受居家医疗护理(HBMC)的老年人当前的医疗决策参与自我效能感与ACP参与度之间的关联。一项全国性队列研究的基线数据分析。招募了在2019年11月至2022年12月期间持续接受HBMC超过两个月的50岁及以上患者。研究招募在六家医院和12家社区居家护理机构进行。使用结构化问卷收集社会人口学特征、决策参与自我效能感和ACP参与度的数据。进行了描述性、分层和多变量逻辑回归分析。总共招募了408名HBMC接受者(平均年龄:80.4岁;55%为女性)。受访者表示决策参与自我效能感中等,但ACP参与度较低。根据行为改变的跨理论模型,自我效能感中等或较高的参与者达成ACP决策“思考阶段”的可能性显著更高(优势比或OR为4.06 - 27.13)。只有当参与者自我效能感高时,他们才更有可能达成ACP决策的“准备和行动阶段”(OR为2.76 - 14.73)。尽管当前医疗决策自我效能感较好的参与者更有可能考虑ACP,但许多人除了指定医疗代理人之外并未采取行动。有必要采取策略提高决策自我效能感,从而在中国文化背景下的居家老年人中增加及时的ACP讨论。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符为NCT04250103,于2020年1月31日注册。

相似文献

1
Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.老年人当前医疗决策参与自我效能与生前预嘱参与之间的关联:一项全国性纵向队列研究的基线结果
J Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;28(1):50-58. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0106. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
The advance care planning PREPARE study among older Veterans with serious and chronic illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对患有严重慢性病的老年退伍军人的预先护理计划PREPARE研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Dec 12;16:570. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1055-9.
3
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.赋权老年人在临床就诊期间讨论预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
The explorations of the awareness, contemplation, self-Efficacy, and readiness of advance care planning, and its predictors in Taiwanese patients while receiving hemodialysis treatment.探讨接受血液透析治疗的台湾患者的意识、思考、自我效能和预备进行预先医疗照护计划的程度,以及其预测因素。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 14;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01063-7.
5
A novel website to prepare diverse older adults for decision making and advance care planning: a pilot study.一个帮助不同老年人群体进行决策和预先护理计划准备的新型网站:一项试点研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Apr;47(4):674-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
6
Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.透析中的预先护理计划与临终决策:一项针对患者及其代理人的随机对照试验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Nov;66(5):813-22. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
7
Engagement in multiple steps of the advance care planning process: a descriptive study of diverse older adults.参与预先护理计划过程的多个步骤:对不同老年人的描述性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jun;56(6):1006-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01701.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
8
Patient Activation: A Key Component of Successful Advance Care Planning.患者激活:成功的预先医疗照护计划的关键组成部分。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;21(12):1778-1782. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0096. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
Advance care planning readiness, barriers, and facilitators among seriously ill Black older adults and their surrogates: A mixed methods study.重病黑人老年人及其代理人的预先护理计划准备情况、障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2025 Jan 14;23:e15. doi: 10.1017/S1478951524001548.
10
Advance care planning information intervention for persons with mild dementia and their family caregivers: Impact on end-of-life care decision conflicts.轻度认知障碍患者及其家庭照护者的预先医疗照护计划信息干预:对临终关怀决策冲突的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240684. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of patient self-efficacy on value co-creation behavior and outcomes in chronic disease management: a cross-sectional study.患者自我效能对慢性病管理中价值共创行为及结果的影响:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1699. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22917-8.