van Vugt Lukas K, Tegzess Erzsi, van der Zwan Marieke, Clahsen-van Groningen Marian C, de Winter Brenda C M, Vart Priya, Reinders Marlies E J, Sanders Jan Stephan F, Berger Stefan P, Hesselink Dennis A
Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Transplant. 2024 Dec;38(12):e70046. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70046.
Alemtuzumab can be an alternative to rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) to treat severe or glucocorticoid-resistant acute T cell-mediated kidney transplant rejection (TCMR). Yet, there are few reports in which these two treatments are evaluated let alone, compared. This study describes the real-world clinical experience of both therapies and compares their efficacy and toxicity.
Kidney transplant recipients of two Dutch transplant centers who received lymphocyte-depleting antibody therapy for severe or glucocorticoid-resistant TCMR were retrospectively evaluated. In the first, alemtuzumab was the standard treatment for this indication, in the second, it was rATG. Patient survival, graft survival and function, and the occurrence of infections and malignancies were reported and compared.
One hundred and forty-three patients treated with alemtuzumab and 57 patients with rATG were evaluated. Patient survival was not significantly different during follow-up (p = 0.55), and 5-year survival rates were 71.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.0-79.9) after alemtuzumab and 70.7% (95% CI: 58.3-85.7) after rATG. Graft survival was not significantly different during follow-up either (p = 0.24), and 5-year graft loss rates were 32.3% (95% CI: 24.2-40.5) after alemtuzumab and 29.2% (95% CI: 16.0-42.4) after rATG. The occurrence of infections and malignancies did not differ between groups.
Mostly, severe TCMRs have good long-term graft survival and function after either alemtuzumab or rATG therapy. No significant differences between the two therapies were found in this real-world clinical experience. Alemtuzumab is an effective alternative to rATG for the treatment of severe TCMR.
阿仑单抗可作为兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(rATG)的替代药物,用于治疗严重的或糖皮质激素抵抗的急性T细胞介导的肾移植排斥反应(TCMR)。然而,很少有报告对这两种治疗方法进行评估,更不用说比较了。本研究描述了这两种疗法在实际临床中的应用经验,并比较了它们的疗效和毒性。
对荷兰两个移植中心接受淋巴细胞清除抗体治疗严重的或糖皮质激素抵抗的TCMR的肾移植受者进行回顾性评估。在第一个中心,阿仑单抗是该适应症的标准治疗药物,在第二个中心,则是rATG。报告并比较了患者生存率、移植物生存率和功能,以及感染和恶性肿瘤的发生情况。
评估了143例接受阿仑单抗治疗的患者和57例接受rATG治疗的患者。随访期间患者生存率无显著差异(p = 0.55),阿仑单抗治疗后的5年生存率为71.0%(95%置信区间[CI]:63.0 - 79.9),rATG治疗后的5年生存率为70.7%(95% CI:58.3 - 85.7)。随访期间移植物生存率也无显著差异(p = 0.2),阿仑单抗治疗后的5年移植物丢失率为32.3%(95% CI:24.2 - 40.5),rATG治疗后的5年移植物丢失率为29.2%(95% CI:16.0 - 42.4)。两组之间感染和恶性肿瘤的发生率无差异。
大多数情况下,严重的TCMR在接受阿仑单抗或rATG治疗后具有良好的长期移植物生存率和功能。在这一实际临床经验中,未发现两种疗法之间存在显著差异。阿仑单抗是治疗严重TCMR的一种有效的rATG替代药物。