Suppr超能文献

测试一种跨环境措施以应对医院门诊全关节置换手术上升趋势的可行性。

Testing the Feasibility of a Cross-Setting Measure to Address the Rising Trend in Hospital Outpatient TJA Procedures.

作者信息

Wallace Lori R, Tan Zhen, Barthel Andrea, Sáenz Matthew P, Grady Jacqueline N, Balestracci Kathleen M B, Bozic Kevin J, Myers Raquel, McDonough Dena L, Lin Zhenqiu, Suter Lisa G

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation, New Haven, Connecticut.

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Mar 19;107(6):604-613. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01395. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elective primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty (collectively, total joint arthroplasties [TJAs]) are commonly performed procedures that can reduce pain and improve function. TJAs are generally safe, but complications can occur. Although historically performed as inpatient procedures, TJAs are increasingly being performed in the outpatient setting. We sought to develop a scientifically acceptable cross-setting measure for evaluating care quality across inpatient and outpatient settings.

METHODS

Using Medicare administrative claims and enrollment data for qualifying TJA patients, we respecified the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) inpatient-only risk-standardized TJA complications measure to assess complication rates following elective primary TJAs performed in an inpatient or outpatient setting. We aligned inpatient and outpatient coding practices and used hierarchical logistic regression to calculate hospital-specific, risk-standardized complication rates (RSCRs). Lower rates correspond to better quality. Using accepted approaches for CMS measures, we tested measure reliability and vetted key measure decisions with patient and provider input.

RESULTS

A single combined model including the procedure setting as a risk variable produced the highest discrimination (C-statistic for a single combined model with a setting indicator: 0.664, C-statistic for the inpatient-only model: 0.651, C-statistic for the outpatient-only model: 0.638). Among the 2,747 hospitals with at least 25 TJAs, the mean RSCR (using the combined model with a setting indicator) was 2.91% (median RSCR: 2.85%; interquartile range: 2.59% to 3.18%). The median odds ratio for complication occurrence at a higher-risk hospital compared with a lower-risk hospital was 1.33.

CONCLUSIONS

We respecified a measure to assess hospital inpatient or outpatient TJA performance and evaluated the reliability and validity of the measure. The findings showed variation in hospital-level complication rates across settings as indicated by this measure, supporting the feasibility of evaluating hospital performance using a more representative population than inpatient TJAs alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

择期初次全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术(统称为全关节置换术 [TJA])是常用的手术,可减轻疼痛并改善功能。TJA 一般较为安全,但也可能发生并发症。尽管过去 TJA 通常作为住院手术进行,但现在越来越多地在门诊环境中开展。我们试图制定一种科学可接受的跨环境指标,用于评估住院和门诊环境下的医疗质量。

方法

利用医疗保险管理索赔数据和符合条件的 TJA 患者的参保数据,我们重新制定了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)仅适用于住院患者的风险标准化 TJA 并发症指标,以评估在住院或门诊环境下进行的择期初次 TJA 后的并发症发生率。我们统一了住院和门诊的编码做法,并使用分层逻辑回归来计算医院特定的、风险标准化的并发症发生率(RSCR)。发生率越低,质量越高。采用 CMS 指标的公认方法,我们测试了指标的可靠性,并通过患者和提供者的意见对关键指标决策进行了审核。

结果

一个将手术环境作为风险变量的单一综合模型具有最高的区分度(带有环境指标的单一综合模型的 C 统计量:0.664,仅适用于住院患者模型的 C 统计量:0.651,仅适用于门诊患者模型的 C 统计量:0.638)。在至少进行了 25 例 TJA 的 2747 家医院中,平均 RSCR(使用带有环境指标的综合模型)为 2.91%(RSCR 中位数:2.85%;四分位间距:2.59%至 3.18%)。高风险医院与低风险医院相比并发症发生的中位数优势比为 1.33。

结论

我们重新制定了一项指标来评估医院住院或门诊 TJA 的表现,并评估了该指标的可靠性和有效性。研究结果表明,该指标显示不同环境下医院层面的并发症发生率存在差异,支持使用比仅住院 TJA 更具代表性的人群来评估医院表现的可行性。

证据水平

预后 III 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验