Zukerman Gil, Tikochinsky Sigal, Yahav Gili, Ben-Itzchak Ester
Department of Communication, Disorders School of Health Sciences Ariel University, Israel.
Department of Communication, Disorders School of Health Sciences, The Bruckner Autism Research Center Ariel University, Israel.
Psychiatry Res. 2025 Jan;343:116304. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116304. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
High comorbidity and diagnostic overlap between autism spectrum disorder and social anxiety disorder have been documented. We examined if differences in adaptive behavior, essential for daily functioning, could differentiate these conditions among young university students. Eighty-eight autistic and 123 non-autistic undergraduates were categorized into four groups: autistic individuals: with low (n = 26)/high (n = 62) social anxiety (SA) symptoms; non-autistic: with low (n = 63)/high (n = 60) SA. The Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS) was utilized to assess three domains of adaptive skills essential for daily functioning: conceptual (academic and communication abilities), social (relationships and understanding social cues), and practical (everyday tasks such as self-care and work). Autistic students, regardless of SA level, reported ABAS scores within the low average range for the conceptual adaptive behavior domain, while non-autistic students had average scores. In terms of ABAS social adaptive behavior scores, both autistic and non-autistic groups with high levels of SA had low average scores. Conversely, those with low SA, whether autistic or non-autistic, exhibited average scores. These results were supported by the regression analyses outcomes. While autism traits and social anxiety showed medium (β=-0.37) and small (β=-0.27) effects, respectively, on conceptual adaptive scores, only social anxiety exhibited significant (medium) effects on social (β=-0.41) and practical (β=-0.34) adaptive scores. Reduced conceptual skills, previously linked to communication and executive function, may distinguish autism from social anxiety. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
自闭症谱系障碍与社交焦虑障碍之间存在高度共病和诊断重叠已被记录在案。我们研究了日常功能所必需的适应性行为差异是否能够区分青年大学生中的这些情况。88名自闭症和123名非自闭症本科生被分为四组:自闭症个体:社交焦虑(SA)症状低(n = 26)/高(n = 62);非自闭症:社交焦虑低(n = 63)/高(n = 60)。采用适应性行为评估系统(ABAS)来评估日常功能所必需的适应性技能的三个领域:概念性(学术和沟通能力)、社会性(人际关系和理解社会线索)和实用性(如自我照顾和工作等日常任务)。自闭症学生,无论社交焦虑水平如何,在概念性适应性行为领域的ABAS得分均处于低平均范围,而非自闭症学生得分平均。在ABAS社交适应性行为得分方面,社交焦虑水平高的自闭症和非自闭症组得分均低。相反,社交焦虑水平低的学生,无论是自闭症还是非自闭症,得分均为平均水平。这些结果得到了回归分析结果的支持。虽然自闭症特征和社交焦虑对概念性适应性得分分别显示出中等(β=-0.37)和小(β=-0.27)的影响,但只有社交焦虑对社会性(β=-0.41)和实用性(β=-0.34)适应性得分显示出显著(中等)影响。先前与沟通和执行功能相关的概念性技能降低可能将自闭症与社交焦虑区分开来。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。