Yu Jingxuan, Liu Bowen, Ruan Caixian, Cao Hong, Fu Rui, Ren Zhanbing
College of Physical Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Department of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Psychol Sport Exerc. 2025 Mar;77:102793. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102793. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
External focus of attention (FOA) has been shown to improve motor performance. However, recent research has found that the effectiveness of FOA is related to the level of expertise. Therefore, this study examined the effects of FOA on putting performance in golfers of different levels of expertise. The neural mechanisms behind FOA were explored in conjunction with fNIRS.
A total of 30 participants, including 15 amateurs (M: 23.31(SD = 1.32)years; 15 males) and 15 novices (M: 22.69(SD = 1.55) years; 11 males; 4 females) were recruited. Participants completed EF and IF golf putting at a duration of 3s per time wearing fNIRS for 3 blocks of 30 s interspersed with 10-s rest blocks.
Behavioral results showed a significant difference in the putting performance of the amateur group under the EF condition compared to the IF condition (P = 0.019), and relative to novices, the amateur group performed better under the EF condition (P = 0.003). fNIRS results revealed that the amateur group had higher activation levels in the right somatosensory association cortex (RSAC) and right motor cortex (RMC) under the IF condition. In contrast, for the novice group, higher activation levels were observed in the left prefrontal cortex and RMC under the EF condition.
Our results revealed SAC and MC over-activation in the amateur group under IF conditions with poor golf putting performance. Our findings suggest that the impairment of automated motor neural networks could be a possible mechanism by which IF affects motor performance with SAC and MC over-activation. Guiding novices to focus on task-related factors consciously could be a potential mechanism by which EF enhances motor performance.
研究表明,外部注意力焦点(FOA)可改善运动表现。然而,最近的研究发现,FOA的有效性与专业水平有关。因此,本研究探讨了FOA对不同专业水平高尔夫球手推杆表现的影响。结合功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)探索了FOA背后的神经机制。
共招募30名参与者,包括15名业余爱好者(年龄M:23.31(标准差=1.32)岁;15名男性)和15名新手(年龄M:22.69(标准差=1.55)岁;11名男性;4名女性)。参与者佩戴fNIRS完成每次持续3秒的外部焦点(EF)和内部焦点(IF)高尔夫推杆,共进行3组,每组30秒,中间穿插10秒的休息时间。
行为结果显示,与内部焦点条件相比,业余组在外部焦点条件下的推杆表现存在显著差异(P = 0.019),并且相对于新手,业余组在外部焦点条件下表现更好(P = 0.003)。fNIRS结果显示,业余组在内部焦点条件下右侧体感联合皮层(RSAC)和右侧运动皮层(RMC)的激活水平较高。相比之下,对于新手组,在外部焦点条件下左侧前额叶皮层和RMC的激活水平较高。
我们的结果显示,业余组在内部焦点条件下高尔夫推杆表现不佳时,体感联合皮层和运动皮层过度激活。我们的研究结果表明,自动运动神经网络的损伤可能是内部焦点通过体感联合皮层和运动皮层过度激活影响运动表现的一种可能机制。引导新手有意识地关注与任务相关的因素可能是外部焦点提高运动表现的一种潜在机制。