Martínez González Á, González Nunes M, Rodeiro Escobar P, Llópiz Castedo J, Cabaleiro Loureiro A, Martínez Espinosa R P, Ruades Patiño R, Lorenzo Canda G, Aguayo Arjona J, Rodríguez Zorrilla S
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Montecelo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Montecelo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2025 Feb;225(2):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rceng.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
Hyponatraemia is common in elderly and hospitalised patients, often caused by the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan and urea in patients with hyponatraemia and SIADH.
An observational cohort study was conducted on 198 patients with SIADH and hyponatraemia (Na+ <135 mmol/L) at the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra from January 2015 to May 2022. Of these, 86 were treated with tolvaptan (average dose of 7.5 mg) and 112 with urea (average dose of 15 g). The primary outcome was the normalization of sodium levels (Na ≥ 135 mmol/L).
The tolvaptan group showed higher sodium concentrations at the end of therapy compared to the urea group (ME = 136, IQR = 135-137 vs. ME = 134, IQR = 132-137; p < 0.001). The time to normalise sodium was shorter with tolvaptan (4 ± 3.4 days) compared to urea (6 ± 3.6 days; p = 0.03). A higher percentage of patients achieved sodium normalization with tolvaptan (83.72% vs. 59.82%; p = 0.005). Tolvaptan had more adverse effects, such as dry mouth, thirst, and sodium overcorrection, while urea caused dysgeusia, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. There were no significant differences in mortality between the groups.
Tolvaptan was more effective and quicker than urea in normalising sodium levels, though it showed a higher percentage of adverse effects, which did not require discontinuation of the drug.
低钠血症在老年患者和住院患者中很常见,通常由抗利尿激素分泌不当综合征(SIADH)引起。本研究评估托伐普坦和尿素对低钠血症合并SIADH患者的疗效和安全性。
2015年1月至2022年5月,在蓬特韦德拉大学综合医院对198例SIADH合并低钠血症(血钠<135 mmol/L)患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。其中,86例接受托伐普坦治疗(平均剂量7.5 mg),112例接受尿素治疗(平均剂量15 g)。主要结局是血钠水平恢复正常(血钠≥135 mmol/L)。
与尿素组相比,托伐普坦组治疗结束时血钠浓度更高(中位数=136,四分位间距=135-137 vs. 中位数=134,四分位间距=132-137;p<0.001)。与尿素组(6±3.6天)相比,托伐普坦使血钠恢复正常的时间更短(4±3.4天;p=0.03)。托伐普坦组实现血钠正常化的患者比例更高(83.72% vs. 59.82%;p=0.005)。托伐普坦有更多不良反应,如口干、口渴和血钠纠正过度,而尿素引起味觉障碍、腹痛和腹泻。两组间死亡率无显著差异。
托伐普坦在使血钠水平恢复正常方面比尿素更有效、更快,尽管其不良反应发生率更高,但无需停药。